You are here:

Happiness

Happiness

Representation Score

5.6/10

Fair

1935

Director

Aleksandr Medvedkin

Runtime

63 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

The film serves as a historical document of ideological transition, emphasizing the collective over the individual. Its strength lies in its critique of traditional religious and capitalist structures, replacing them with a secular, state-centric social framework. However, the film lacks modern multi-layered markers, such as representation for LGBTQ+ identities or neurodivergent and physically disabled characters.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Happiness have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film focuses solely on straight relationships and does not depict any LGBTQ+ identities or same-sex intimacy.

How does Happiness portray gender?

Good

Women are shown as active participants in the collective workforce, challenging traditional gender roles and emphasizing labor-based equality.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Happiness?

Limited

Casting reflects a predominantly Slavic demographic, focusing on peasant identity without broader racial or ethnic variety.

How does Happiness represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The film aggressively criticizes religious authority and individual ownership, prioritizing a secular, collective ideology over traditional religious and capitalist structures.

Does Happiness include disability representation?

Minimal

The film does not engage significantly with disability as a source of empowerment. Instead, the protagonist's limitations are used primarily for comedic effect.

Present on Screen

  • Challenges traditional religious and capitalist structures through a secular, collective lens.
  • Shows women as active participants in the public workforce.
  • Critiques individualist ownership in favor of communal progress.

Limited or Absent

  • Does not represent LGBTQ+ identities or non-assuming gender matches what was assigned at birth gender expressions.
  • Uses personal limitations for comedic effect rather than exploring disability with nuance.
  • Fails to provide broader racial or ethnic variety beyond the Slavic peasantry.

Official Synopsis

A hapless loser (with the surname of Loser) undergoes misadventures with avaracious clergy, a tired horse, and a walking granary (among other things) on his road to collectivized happiness.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.