
The Last Supper
1976

1965
Not RatedDirector
Pier Paolo Pasolini
Runtime
137 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Along a rocky, barren coastline, Jesus begins teaching, primarily using parables. He attracts disciples; he's stern, brusque, and demanding. His parables often take on the powers that be, so he and his teachings come to the attention of the Pharisees, the chief priests, and elders. They conspire to have him arrested, beaten, tried, and crucified, just as he prophesied to his followers.
Overall Score
Good
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film adheres strictly to first-century biblical contexts. It focuses on male-centric discipleship without depicting non-heteronormative identities or critiques of heteronormativity.
Gender Representation
Central agency and theological discourse are driven by male figures. While Mary Magdalene appears, she occupies a traditional archetype rather than subverting the male-dominated narrative architecture.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
Pasolini rejects whitewashed religious aesthetics by using Mediterranean, earthy casting. The use of non-professional laborers provides an authentic ethnic identity that aligns with the Levant's historical reality.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film critiques established power structures by framing religious and political institutions as oppressive. It centers on the sacredness of the poor to deconstruct worldly status.
Disability Representation
No characters with visible or invisible disabilities are central to the narrative. Disability is not utilized as a plot device or for mockery.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Pasolini’s direction transforms a biblical narrative into a study of class struggle. By utilizing non-professional actors and a Mediterranean aesthetic, the film successfully dismantles the polished, Eurocentric traditions of Western religious cinema. While the film excels in ethnic authenticity and its anti-materialist critique of institutional authority, it remains limited by its period-specific subject matter. The lack of gender diversity and LGBTQ+ representation reflects the traditional, male-centric frameworks of the historical text. Ultimately, the work is defined by its progressive intent to highlight the sub-proletariat. It replaces institutional sanctity with a revolutionary, humanistic perspective centered on the oppressed.

1976

1999

1987

1972

2018

1968

1961

1975

2006

1964

1970

1974
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.