You are here:

No Poster Available

Listening In

1932

Passed

Director

Leslie Pearce

Runtime

13 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Arthur Stone gets into trouble due to a crossed phone line in this Mack Sennett comedy.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

2.9/10

Limited


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film contains no evidence of non-heteronormative identities. There are no narratives addressing sexual orientation or gender identity.

Gender Representation

Limited

The comedy likely relies on traditional archetypes from the early 1930s. It appears to follow conventional gender roles without subverting social hierarchies.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The production likely adheres to the homogeneous casting norms of early Hollywood. There is no indication of intersectional character depth or diverse casting.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Limited

The plot focuses on a mechanical mishap involving a phone line. It operates within the social norms of the period rather than challenging them.

Disability Representation

Minimal

No characters with visible or invisible disabilities are identified. The narrative lacks representation for the disability community.

Strengths

  • The film utilizes classic Mack Sennett slapstick traditions.
  • The narrative provides a clear, focused comedic premise.

Areas for Improvement

  • The film lacks representation for LGBTQ+ and disabled communities.
  • The story relies on conventional gender roles and homogeneous casting.
  • There is a lack of intersectional character depth or social critique.

AI Analysis

Listening In is a standard Mack Sennett slapstick comedy centered on a situational misunderstanding. The plot relies on the trope of a crossed phone line to drive its kinetic, physical humor. Because the film prioritizes situational irony and broad archetypes, it lacks the narrative depth to explore identity or social hierarchies. It functions as a traditional period piece that stays within the era's established social boundaries. Ultimately, the film offers little in the way of diverse representation, focusing instead on the mechanics of comedic timing and mechanical mishaps.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.