You are here:

Histoire(s) du Cinéma 3a: The Coin of the Absolute

Histoire(s) du Cinéma 3a: The Coin of the Absolute

Representation Score

6.7/10

Good

2006

Director

Jean-Luc Godard

Runtime

27 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Jean-Luc Godard’s work is a postmodern video essay that uses the history of film to examine the moral and systemic issues of the modern era. It disrupts conventional ways of watching movies through a fragmented, non-linear structure. The film’s strength lies in its systemic critique of Western historical narratives. It uses film as a tool for socio-political questioning, aligning with anti-capitalist and anti-institutional critiques. However, the documentary format lacks character-driven ability to act and traditional storytelling structures.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Histoire(s) du Cinéma 3a: The Coin of the Absolute have LGBTQ+ representation?

Fair

The film questions traditional views of identity by challenging the idea that everyone is straight or cisgender. It focuses on breaking down these ideas rather than developing specific character arcs.

How does Histoire(s) du Cinéma 3a: The Coin of the Absolute portray gender?

Good

The film challenges traditional gender roles by avoiding typical domestic or romantic storylines. Instead, it explores the female image in film history through fragmented, subjective perspectives.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Histoire(s) du Cinéma 3a: The Coin of the Absolute?

Good

The film disrupts white-centric histories by looking at how visual media interacts with colonialist frameworks. It uses filmic fragments to explore the complexities of global history.

How does Histoire(s) du Cinéma 3a: The Coin of the Absolute represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The film criticizes traditional Western institutions by prioritizing subjective, non-linear truths over singular, authoritative historical or religious narratives.

Does Histoire(s) du Cinéma 3a: The Coin of the Absolute include disability representation?

Minimal

The essayistic and non-narrative nature of this documentary installment does not provide enough information to assess the representation of physical or neurodivergent identities.

Present on Screen

  • Strong systemic critique of Western hegemony and colonialist frameworks.
  • Sophisticated deconstruction of traditional historical and religious narratives.
  • Intellectual engagement with challenging traditional views of identity.

Limited or Absent

  • Lack of explicit character-driven ability to act or individual identity portrayal.
  • Insufficient evidence regarding the representation of disability or neurodivergence.
  • Absence of traditional narrative structures to ground social themes.

Official Synopsis

Part 5 of Godard's 8 part examination of the history of the concept of cinema and how it relates to the 20th century.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.