You are here:
The Two Faces of Dr. Jekyll

The Two Faces of Dr. Jekyll

1960

Approved

Director

Terence Fisher

Runtime

88 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

After a series of scientific experiments directed towards freeing the inner man and controlling human personalities, the kindly, generous Dr Henry Jekyll succeeds in freeing his own alter ego, Edward Hyde, a sadistic, evil creature whose pleasure is murder.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

1.6/10

Minimal


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film operates within a strictly heteronormative Victorian framework. It lacks any depictions of non-cisnormative identities or queer subtext.

Gender Representation

Limited

Female characters serve as peripheral figures within conventional social roles. The narrative centers on masculine authority and the male lead's struggle for self-mastery.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Minimal

The cast is predominantly white, reflecting a homogeneous Victorian London. There is no inclusion of non-Anglo-Saxon characters or diverse perspectives.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Minimal

The story reinforces Western institutional stability through a traditional moral dichotomy. It functions as a cautionary tale regarding scientific hubris and social order.

Disability Representation

Limited

The transformation into Hyde acts as a metaphor for lost psychological agency. However, this serves a horror plot device rather than a nuanced portrayal of disability.

Strengths

  • The film provides a clear, impactful exploration of psychological duality and the loss of agency.
  • It maintains a consistent and atmospheric Victorian setting that adheres to its historical period.

Areas for Improvement

  • The narrative lacks representation of non-cisnormative identities or queer subtext.
  • Female characters are relegated to peripheral roles without significant agency.
  • The cast lacks racial and ethnic diversity, reflecting a very narrow social landscape.
  • Disability is used as a horror trope rather than a nuanced character element.

AI Analysis

Terence Fisher’s 1960 horror classic is a product of its era, prioritizing a traditional moral structure over social subversion. The film focuses almost exclusively on the internal psychological duality of its male protagonist, leaving little room for diverse perspectives. The narrative architecture reinforces established Victorian hierarchies. By centering the conflict on a single man's scientific hubris, the film maintains a homogeneous social landscape that lacks intersectional depth. While the film uses psychological transformation as a central plot device, it does not offer meaningful representation of lived experiences. It remains a quintessential example of mid-century genre filmmaking that upholds conventional social norms.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.