You are here:

Ladies of the Jury

Ladies of the Jury

Representation Score

3.1/10

Limited

1932

NR

Director

Lowell Sherman

Runtime

63 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Lowell Sherman’s Pre-Code direction allows for a nuanced exploration of social norms. The film's primary strength lies in its gender dynamics, particularly how it challenges the era's standards of female passivity through a disruptive female protagonist. However, the film lacks diverse representation. It remains anchored in the socioeconomic and demographic norms of its time, offering little portrayal of racial, LGBTQ+, or disabled communities. Ultimately, while the film provides a meaningful look at women's ability to drive the story within a patriarchal institution, it remains a product of a homogeneous studio system.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Ladies of the Jury have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film does not feature any characters or stories related to LGBTQ+ identities.

How does Ladies of the Jury portray gender?

Good

The movie challenges traditional gender roles by placing an unconventional woman in a position of judicial power. Mrs. Crane's ability to disrupt a male-dominated institution highlights her significant role in driving the story.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Ladies of the Jury?

Minimal

The film reflects the demographic uniformity typical of 1930s Hollywood. Its focus on high-society settings indicates a narrative centered around a predominantly white, Anglo-Saxon social class.

How does Ladies of the Jury represent religion and culture?

Fair

The film explores themes of subjective morality and the fallibility of justice. It questions the idea of a single legal morality through its unorthodox protagonist.

Does Ladies of the Jury include disability representation?

Minimal

There are no characters with visible or invisible disabilities featured in the narrative.

Present on Screen

  • Challenges traditional gender hierarchies by giving a woman significant judicial influence.
  • Offers a meaningful exploration of women's ability to drive the story within a male-dominated legal institution.
  • Questions standard expectations of female passivity through an unorthodox protagonist.

Limited or Absent

  • Lacks any representation of LGBTQ+ identities or narratives.
  • Shows no evidence of racial or ethnic diversity within the cast.
  • Does not include characters with visible or invisible disabilities.

Official Synopsis

Society matron Mrs. Livingston Baldwin Crane is selected as a juror in the trial of former chorus girl Yvette Gordon, who's accused of murdering her rich older husband. In court and during deliberations, Mrs. Crane proves to be a disruptive and unorthodox juror.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.