New Showbiz

You are here:
What Price Hollywood?

What Price Hollywood?

1932

NR

Director

George Cukor

Runtime

88 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Sassy and ambitious waitress Mary Evans amuses and befriends amiable seldom-sober Hollywood film director Max Carey when he stumbles into her restaurant. Max invites Mary to his film premiere and, after a night of drinking and carousing, Mary is granted a screen test. A studio contract follows. Just as Mary finds her dreams coming true, Carey’s life and career begins its descent.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

3.0/10

Limited


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film focuses on heteronormative romantic entanglements and traditional marriage structures. There is no evidence of same-sex intimacy or non-cisnormative identities within the narrative.

Gender Representation

Good

Mary Evans' professional ascent challenges traditional hierarchies by centering female ambition. The film explores personal autonomy and complex choices regarding infidelity rather than reinforcing submissive tropes.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Minimal

The production reflects the era's systemic constraints with a largely homogeneous cast. The social world is centered within a white, upper-middle-class Hollywood ecosystem.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Fair

The narrative engages with moral relativism and the ambiguity of ethics in the studio system. It avoids didactic morality, though it remains within the social framework of its time.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no visible or invisible disability representation. Characters are depicted within the context of standard physical and neurotypical social functioning.

Strengths

  • Centering female professional ambition and agency.
  • Nuanced exploration of complex personal choices and infidelity.
  • Sophisticated handling of character depth and interpersonal dynamics.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lack of racial and ethnic diversity within the cast.
  • Absence of LGBTQ+ representation or non-cisnormative identities.
  • No visible or invisible disability representation.

AI Analysis

George Cukor’s direction provides a sophisticated look at female agency, moving beyond the domestic tropes common in the early 1930s. By centering Mary Evans' career trajectory, the film offers a nuanced view of professional ambition within a male-dominated industry. However, the film is limited by the era's systemic constraints, offering almost no racial or LGBTQ+ diversity. The cast remains largely homogeneous, focusing strictly on white, heteronormative social structures. Ultimately, the film serves as a transitional text. It succeeds in disrupting gendered expectations and moral absolutism, even while failing to provide intersectional representation.

How are these scores produced? →

Similar Movies

Movie poster for Tarnished Lady

Tarnished Lady

1931

No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.4 out of 10

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.