You are here:
Virgin Soil Upturned

Virgin Soil Upturned

1959

Director

Aleksandr Ivanov

Runtime

278 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

The movie is based on the the same name novel of the Nobel Prize In Literature Winner Mikhail Sholokhov. The action is taken place in 20-30-s years of the XX century in the Russian countryside going through an uneasy process of collectivization.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.1/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film lacks any evidence of LGBTQ+ characters or non-heteronormative narratives. It adheres to the strict social norms typical of 1950s Soviet cinema.

Gender Representation

Fair

The narrative focuses on patriarchal communal structures during the transition of the Russian countryside. While social hierarchies are disrupted, female agency remains secondary to male leadership.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The setting depicts a culturally homogeneous Soviet rural population. It avoids racial stereotypes but lacks the intersectional diversity found in more contemporary cinematic works.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Excellent

The story provides a strong critique of individualist property ownership and traditional agrarian capitalism. It prioritizes collective identity over the old village hierarchies.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no discernible evidence regarding the portrayal of physical or neurodivergent disabilities within the film's narrative.

Strengths

  • Provides a robust critique of capitalist structures and individualist property ownership.
  • Offers a deep exploration of systemic social and economic restructuring in agrarian society.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks intersectional diversity, specifically regarding LGBTQ+ and multi-ethnic representation.
  • Maintains a patriarchal focus that limits the agency of female characters within the communal structure.

AI Analysis

Virgin Soil Upturned is a historical drama centered on the systemic upheaval of collectivization in the 1930s Russian countryside. Its narrative strength lies in its ideological critique of Western-aligned economic models and individualist property ownership. However, the film lacks modern markers of intersectional diversity. It presents a culturally homogeneous population and adheres to the patriarchal social structures of its era, offering little representation for LGBTQ+ identities or diverse ethnic groups. Ultimately, the film functions as a study of systemic change rather than a showcase of social inclusivity, favoring collective evolution over individualist or traditionalist hierarchies.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.