
Dubrovsky
2014

1936
K-16Director
Aleksandr Ivanovsky
Runtime
75 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Peasant rebelling, pictures of folk anger - here accent that had to put Ivanovo in a new film. The manuscript of novel was found post mortem Pushkin in his papers. The name he did not have and remained unfinished. Intention of "Dubrovskiy" was prompted by an actual incident. A few variants of upshot of novel were saved. Ivanov became familiar with all and wrote it.
Overall Score
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film adheres to the social and cinematic conventions of its era. There are no depictions of non-heteronormative identities or same-sex intimacy.
Gender Representation
The narrative centers on male agency and the protagonist's transition to an outlaw. Female characters primarily serve as emotional anchors or romantic interests.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The film presents a relatively homogeneous ethnic cast typical of 19th-century Russia. It focuses on social class rather than ethnic or racial intersectionality.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film engages deeply with anti-feudalist themes by framing the aristocracy as corrupt. It prioritizes class solidarity and the defiance of oppressive institutions.
Disability Representation
There is no significant evidence regarding the portrayal of physical or neurodivergent disabilities in the film.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Dubrovskiy is a period drama that prioritizes socioeconomic friction over individual identity diversity. The film's strength lies in its cultural critique, using a Robin Hood-style narrative to challenge the legitimacy of the landed aristocracy and established legal authority. However, the film remains deeply traditional in its social depictions. It lacks representation for LGBTQ+ identities and maintains a homogeneous ethnic cast consistent with its historical setting. Gender roles are also strictly defined, with male characters driving the political and physical conflict. Ultimately, the film functions as a study of class struggle. While it fails to provide diverse representation in terms of race, gender, or orientation, it succeeds in deconstructing power structures through its focus on systemic resistance.

2014

1926

1937

1978

1956

1962

1959

1934

1925

1963

1966

1973
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.