I Can No Longer Hear the Guitar
1991
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 7.2 out of 10
You are here:
The Devil, Probably
Representation Score
5.7/10
Fair
1977
Not RatedDirector
Robert Bresson
Runtime
97 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetNew Showbiz Analysis
The film is a minimalist deconstruction of mid-20th-century institutional stability. It prioritizes philosophical inquiry over broad demographic representation, focusing on the breakdown of religion, politics, and the nuclear family. While the film lacks explicit LGBTQ+ identities, racial diversity, or strong female characters, it excels in its cultural critique. It challenges systemic authority by framing the protagonist's detachment as a reasonable response to a failing society. Ultimately, the film explores existential despair, trading traditional identity politics for a deep, though narrow, look at moral relativism and the failure of Western structures.
Category Breakdown
Does The Devil, Probably have LGBTQ+ representation?
The film doesn't center stories around non-straight identities. Queer identity isn't used to explore social isolation deeply.
How does The Devil, Probably portray gender?
The film avoids typical strong male character clichés but lacks female characters who play significant roles in driving the story.
How racially and ethnically diverse is The Devil, Probably?
The cast is mostly uniform, focusing on a specific Western experience. The story doesn't include a wide range of racial backgrounds.
How does The Devil, Probably represent religion and culture?
The film effectively critiques Western institutions like the Church and State. It portrays rejecting these frameworks as a rational response to a spiritual void.
Does The Devil, Probably include disability representation?
Mental suffering is viewed through an existential lens rather than as clinical disability. These struggles are shown as universal signs of societal decay.
Present on Screen
- Sophisticated critique of Western institutions like the Church and State.
- Avoids traditional strong male character clichés.
- Doesn't use disability as a mere plot device.
Limited or Absent
- Lacks multi-layered racial diversity and diverse casting.
- No nuanced, actively leading female characters.
- Minimal focus on non-straight identities or queer character arcs.
Official Synopsis
Charles drifts through politics, religion and psychoanalysis, rejecting them all. Once he realises the depth of his disgust with the moral and physical decline of the society he lives in, he decides that suicide is the only option...
Where to Watch
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select or search, Escape to close.
Similar Movies
Four Nights of a Dreamer
1972
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 0.9 out of 10
Jonah Who Will Be 25 in the Year 2000
1976
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 7.0 out of 10
Mouchette
1967
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 4.9 out of 10
Born in 68
2008
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 5.4 out of 10
Taking Off
1971
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 8.0 out of 10
Vivre Sa Vie
1962
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 7.1 out of 10
Blow-Up
1966
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 3.8 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.