You are here:
The Devil, Probably

The Devil, Probably

1977

Not Rated

Director

Robert Bresson

Runtime

97 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Charles drifts through politics, religion and psychoanalysis, rejecting them all. Once he realises the depth of his disgust with the moral and physical decline of the society he lives in, he decides that suicide is the only option...

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.3/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The film lacks central narratives focused on non-cisnormative identities. While interpersonal dynamics feel fragmented and detached, queer identity is not used as a primary driver for exploring social alienation.

Gender Representation

Fair

Bresson avoids traditional tropes of masculine strength or stable providers. However, the film lacks high-agency female characters, which limits the depth of its gender representation.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The cast remains largely homogenous, reflecting a specific social milieu. The narrative focuses on a localized experience of Western despair without utilizing intersectional racial breadth.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Excellent

The film excels in critiquing Western institutions like the Church and State. It portrays the rejection of these frameworks as a logical response to a spiritual vacuum.

Disability Representation

Limited

Mental anguish is treated through an existentialist lens rather than as clinical disability. These struggles are presented as universal symptoms of societal decay rather than specific medical experiences.

Strengths

  • Sophisticated critique of established Western institutions like the Church and State.
  • Subversion of traditional gender hierarchies and masculine tropes of strength.
  • Avoids using disability as a mere plot device or for inspiration porn.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lack of intersectional racial breadth and diverse casting.
  • Absence of nuanced, high-agency female characters.
  • Minimal focus on non-cisnormative identities or queer character arcs.

AI Analysis

The film is a minimalist deconstruction of mid-20th-century institutional stability. It prioritizes philosophical inquiry over demographic breadth, focusing on the erosion of religion, politics, and the nuclear family. While the work lacks explicit representation of LGBTQ+ identities, racial diversity, or high-agency female characters, it finds strength in its sophisticated cultural critique. It subverts systemic authority by framing the protagonist's detachment as a legitimate response to a decaying society. Ultimately, the film functions as a study of existentialist despair. It trades traditional identity politics for a deep, albeit narrow, exploration of moral relativism and the failure of Western structures.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.