You are here:

No Poster Available

Thomas Graal's Best Film

1917

Director

Mauritz Stiller

Runtime

60 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Thomas Graal's a screenwriter, is very fond of his secretary Bessie. Overtaken by a kiss by Thomas she runs away. In his misfortune Thomas writes a screenplay inspired by Bessie. But she has not been really honest with him. 31 minutes of runtime are missing and presumed lost.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

3.8/10

Limited


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The narrative focuses on heterosexual romantic tension between a screenwriter and his secretary. No evidence of queer subtext or non-cisnormative identities exists in the surviving records.

Gender Representation

Fair

Bessie possesses significant agency, disrupting the male lead's expectations by fleeing after an unwanted advance. Her actions drive the plot, moving her beyond a passive object of the male gaze.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Minimal

The film reflects the homogeneous social structures of 1917 Sweden. There is no indication of a diverse cast or non-Anglo-Saxon majority ensembles in the synopsis.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Fair

The story explores themes of subjective truth and the blurred lines between reality and art. It leans toward moral relativism through the protagonist's struggle with a woman's true character.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no documented evidence regarding the portrayal of physical or neurodivergent characters in the available historical records.

Strengths

  • Bessie displays agency by making decisions that disrupt the male protagonist's expectations.
  • The narrative explores complex themes of subjective truth and the relationship between life and art.

Areas for Improvement

  • The film lacks any visible representation of LGBTQ+ identities or queer subtext.
  • The cast appears to reflect a homogeneous social structure with no racial or ethnic diversity.

AI Analysis

Mauritz Stiller’s 1917 comedy offers a glimpse into early Swedish cinema, characterized by the social homogeneity of its era. While the film lacks modern intersectional diversity, it avoids the era's typical trap of making female characters purely submissive. The strength of the work lies in its character dynamics, particularly the agency shown by Bessie. However, the film is limited by the demographic constraints of early 20th-century European production, offering little in the way of racial or LGBTQ+ representation. Ultimately, the film serves as a period piece that subverts some gendered passivity while remaining firmly rooted in the era's conventional social structures.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.