New Showbiz

You are here:

No Poster Available

Butterfly Range

1922

Passed

Director

Neal Hart

Runtime

53 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Butterfly Range is a 1922 Western

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

1.9/10

Minimal

Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film lacks any evidence of non-heteronormative identities or same-sex intimacy. It adheres to the cisnormative and heteronormative social structures common in 1922 cinema.

Gender Representation

Limited

Women appear to be relegated to domestic roles or passive figures requiring protection. The film reinforces traditional masculine leadership and patriarchal stability.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Minimal

The production likely centers on Anglo-Saxon protagonists, following the homogeneous casting patterns of early Hollywood. There is no evidence of diverse casting or subverted racial hierarchies.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Limited

The narrative emphasizes frontier morality and the romanticization of expansionist ideals. It operates within traditional Western values rather than deconstructing established institutions.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no specific information available regarding the portrayal of characters with disabilities. The surviving records do not provide enough detail to make a determination.

Strengths

  • The film serves as a clear historical example of early 20th-century Western genre tropes and frontier morality.

Areas for Improvement

  • The film lacks representation of LGBTQ+ identities and diverse racial or ethnic groups.
  • Gender roles are limited to traditional, passive depictions of women.
  • The narrative fails to challenge or deconstruct the era's prevailing social hierarchies.

AI Analysis

Butterfly Range is a product of its era, functioning as a standard Western that reinforces the social and cultural hierarchies of the early 1920s. The film relies on traditional tropes of frontier justice and rugged individualism, offering little in the way of social subversion. The representation is heavily skewed toward a homogeneous, Anglo-Saxon perspective. Gender roles are rigid, placing women in subordinate or domestic positions, while the narrative structure supports the foundational myths of the American West rather than challenging them. Ultimately, the film serves as a historical snapshot of early silent cinema's narrow focus. It lacks meaningful diversity across LGBTQ+, racial, and gendered spectrums, sticking strictly to the established norms of the genre.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.