When the Woman Butts In
1960
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.0 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
The D.T.'s
1966
15Director
Jan Halldoff
Runtime
80 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
An eccentric, offbeat man performing pranks and peculiarities becomes a major concern for the Stockholm authorities. He mingles with bizarre slum characters and dreams of his ideal girl.
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
4.0/10
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film lacks explicit evidence of LGBTQ+ characters or same-sex intimacy. The protagonist's search for an 'ideal girl' suggests a conventional romantic trajectory.
Gender Representation
The story centers on a male protagonist's agency and his friction with authority. The pursuit of an 'ideal girl' may reinforce traditional gendered hierarchies.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The 1966 Stockholm setting suggests a demographic homogeneity typical of the era. The narrative focuses on class-based distinctions rather than racial or ethnic diversity.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film critiques social conformity by centering on social outsiders and slum characters. It rejects polished, middle-class standards in favor of eccentric, subjective morality.
Disability Representation
The protagonist's 'peculiarities' may serve as metaphors for neurodivergence. However, it is unclear if these traits are treated with agency or used as comedic devices.
Strengths
- Challenges the rigidity of state institutions and social conformity.
- Provides a focus on social outcasts and characters living outside mainstream strata.
- Explores unconventional, character-driven comedy through an eccentric protagonist.
Areas for Improvement
- Lacks representation of diverse racial or ethnic identities.
- Relies on conventional romantic hierarchies and gendered objects of desire.
- Provides no explicit evidence of LGBTQ+ characters or identities.
AI Analysis
Jan Halldoff’s 1966 comedy functions primarily as a character study of a social outsider. The film finds its strength in challenging institutional rigidity and exploring the lives of those on the periphery of Stockholm society. However, the work remains limited by the era's demographic norms. It lacks documented evidence of racial, ethnic, or LGBTQ+ diversity, focusing instead on class-based eccentricity and traditional romantic pursuits. Ultimately, while the film disrupts social order through its anti-authoritarian protagonist, it does not engage with intersectional identity politics.
Similar Movies
The Maniacs
1964
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.4 out of 10
The Lodger
1967
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.4 out of 10
The Sandwich Man
1966
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.6 out of 10
Docking the Boat
1965
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.0 out of 10
The Professional Secrets of Dr. Apfelgluck
1991
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.5 out of 10
As Long as You've Got Your Health
1966
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.1 out of 10
The Big Dig
1969
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.9 out of 10
The Testing of Eric Olthwaite
1977
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.6 out of 10
The Cruise
1970
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.9 out of 10
Cutting It Short
1981
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.3 out of 10
Adventures of a Dentist
1967
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.7 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.