How We Robbed the Bank of Italy
1966
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.6 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
The Wrong Arm of the Law
1963
NRDirector
Cliff Owen
Runtime
94 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
The crooks in London know how it works. No one carries guns and no one resists the police. Then a new gang appears that go one better. They dress as police and steal from the crooks. This upset's the natural order of the police/criminal relationship and the police and the crooks join forces to catch the IPOs (Impersonating Police Officers), including an armoured car robbery in which the police must help the gangs to set a trap.
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
1.4/10
Minimal
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film operates within a strictly heteronormative framework. There is no presence of non-cisnormative identities or same-sex intimacy within the narrative.
Gender Representation
The story centers almost exclusively on male camaraderie and conflict. Female characters are relegated to peripheral roles and lack meaningful agency in the plot.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The cast reflects the demographic homogeneity of 1960s London. The film presents a predominantly white, Anglo-Saxon social environment without significant characters of color.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
This genre caper maintains the social status quo rather than offering systemic critiques. It operates within the conventional social expectations of its era.
Disability Representation
There are no depictions of visible or invisible disabilities. The primary character arcs do not include neurodivergence or chronic illness.
Strengths
- The film successfully adheres to the established comedic and crime tropes of the early 1960s.
Areas for Improvement
- The narrative lacks agency for female characters, who remain peripheral to the main plot.
- The cast lacks racial and ethnic diversity, reflecting a very narrow demographic.
- The film fails to represent LGBTQ+ identities or any form of disability.
AI Analysis
The film is a period-specific crime comedy that mirrors the social and demographic norms of 1963. It prioritizes situational humor and established genre tropes over the exploration of identity or social hierarchies. The narrative architecture reinforces traditional power dynamics through a male-centric cast and a homogeneous depiction of the London working class. It lacks the intentionality to address intersectional identities or diverse social backgrounds. Ultimately, the work functions as a traditional genre piece that adheres to the era's lack of diverse representation, focusing on the relationship between police and criminals rather than social deconstruction.
Similar Movies
The Hot Rock
1972
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.3 out of 10
The Swindle
1977
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.4 out of 10
Seven Times Seven
1968
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.6 out of 10
After the Fox
1966
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.2 out of 10
The Act
1984
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.6 out of 10
The Brain
1969
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.8 out of 10
The Little Mouse
1954
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.7 out of 10
It's in the Bank
2019
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.4 out of 10
Four Murders Are Enough, Darling
1971
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.9 out of 10
Harry and Walter Go to New York
1976
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.6 out of 10
Rotten to the Core
1965
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.3 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.