It's in the Bank
2019
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.4 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
The Act
1984
RDirector
Sig Shore
Runtime
94 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Blackmail, a complex heist, and political snakery collide into a complicated caper full of disguises and surprises, where it's never clear who's really working for whom.
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
3.6/10
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film lacks explicit evidence of non-cisnormative identities or same-sex intimacy. While the plot involves disguises, there is no confirmed representation of LGBTQ+ characters.
Gender Representation
Sarah Langenfeld appears in the top billing, suggesting female involvement. However, the heist and political themes lean toward traditional masculine-coded agency and leadership.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The cast appears to lack significant racial or ethnic diversity. The narrative follows a homogeneous casting pattern typical of 1980s crime capers.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The story explores political corruption and moral ambiguity. It remains unclear if this serves as a systemic critique or a standard genre exploration of ethics.
Disability Representation
There is no mention of characters with visible or invisible disabilities in the film's narrative.
Strengths
- The presence of Sarah Langenfeld in the top billing suggests female involvement in the central plot.
Areas for Improvement
- The film lacks visible representation of LGBTQ+ identities or same-sex intimacy.
- The cast shows no evidence of racial or ethnic diversity.
- There is no representation of characters with disabilities.
- The narrative leans toward traditional, masculine-coded leadership and agency.
AI Analysis
The Act functions as a conventional 1980s crime caper that prioritizes plot mechanics over intersectional identity. The narrative focuses on blackmail, heists, and political maneuvering, which often relies on traditional cinematic tropes. Representation is minimal across most categories. The film lacks visible LGBTQ+ characters and shows no evidence of racial or ethnic diversity in its cast. While a female lead is billed, the genre's focus suggests a reliance on masculine-coded power structures. Ultimately, the film operates within standard genre boundaries. It does not appear to intentionally integrate diverse identities or disrupt established social hierarchies through its storytelling.
Similar Movies
The Hornet's Nest
1976
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.6 out of 10
After the Fox
1966
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.2 out of 10
The Instigators
2024
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.7 out of 10
The Swindle
1977
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.4 out of 10
The Hot Rock
1972
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.3 out of 10
The Jönsson Gang Turns Up Again
1986
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.3 out of 10
White Lies
1998
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.4 out of 10
The Wrong Arm of the Law
1963
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.4 out of 10
Four Murders Are Enough, Darling
1971
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.9 out of 10
Burglar
1987
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.9 out of 10
A Nightingale Sang in Berkeley Square
1980
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.2 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.