You are here:

...First Do No Harm

Name: ...First Do No Harm
Director: Jim Abrahams
Released: 1997
Duration: 90 min

Representation Score

5.7/10

Fair

1997

PG-13

Director

Jim Abrahams

Runtime

90 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

The film excels as a character-driven drama centered on maternal ability to act and the realities of living with a chronic disability. By focusing on the challenges of navigating the medical system, it offers a meaningful perspective on the struggles faced by families dealing with neurological illnesses. However, the film lacks broader diversity. The narrative remains confined to a traditional family structure, missing opportunities to explore a wider range of identities or systemic critiques beyond the medical context.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does ...First Do No Harm have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film focuses on a traditional family setting without including any LGBTQ+ characters or critiques of the assumption that everyone is straight or cisgender.

How does ...First Do No Harm portray gender?

Fair

Lori Reimuller challenges the male-dominated medical establishment to advocate for her son. This shifts the focus from traditional male dominance to female leadership, making her the primary driver of the plot.

How racially and ethnically diverse is ...First Do No Harm?

Fair

The narrative centers on a mother's struggle, but there is no confirmed evidence of a non-white majority cast. Specific racialized power dynamics are not explicitly addressed.

How does ...First Do No Harm represent religion and culture?

Fair

The story examines the conflict between scientific orthodoxy and alternative methods such as the Ketogenic Diet. It avoids religious morality and emphasizes individual parental ability to act.

Does ...First Do No Harm include disability representation?

Good

The plot revolves around the experiences of a child with epilepsy, providing a detailed look at the complexities of managing a chronic neurological condition.

Present on Screen

Strong focus on female leadership against male-dominated medical authority.
Nuanced depiction of the lived experience of epilepsy and chronic illness.
Effective exploration of the tension between scientific orthodoxy and alternative treatments.

Limited or Absent

Lack of LGBTQ+ representation or non-assuming gender matches what was assigned at birth identities.
Limited exploration of racial diversity or multi-layered casting.
Absence of broader systemic or cultural critiques.

Official Synopsis

When Lori Reimuller learns that her young son Robbie has epilepsy, she first trusts the judgment of the hospital staff in how best to bring it under control. As Robbie's health slides radically downhill, however, she becomes frustrated and desperate, and so does her own research into the existing literature on treatments. When she decides to try an alternative treatment called the Ketogenic Diet, devised long ago by a doctor from Johns Hopkins, she is met with narrow-minded resistance from Robbie's doctor, who is prepared to take legal action to prevent Lori from removing him from the hospital.

How are these scores produced? →