You are here:

Smile at Last

Name: Smile at Last
Director: Leida Laius
Released: 1985
Duration: 85 min

Representation Score

7.2/10

Good

1985

Director

Leida Laius

Runtime

85 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Smile at Last is a social realist drama that excels in deconstructing domestic and institutional stability. By focusing on a female protagonist struggling against a broken system, the film avoids traditional patriarchal clichés. However, the film lacks breadth in its representation of identity. The narrative remains strictly centered around heterosexual relationships and appears to inhabit a culturally homogeneous setting, offering little room for diverse perspectives. Ultimately, the film succeeds as a critique of institutional and familial flaws, even if it lacks diversity in its cast and romantic themes.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Smile at Last have LGBTQ+ representation?

Fair

The story focuses on a heterosexual relationship between Mari and Robi. There is no indication of queer relationships or non-traditional gender identities.

How does Smile at Last portray gender?

Good

Mari's journey highlights a female protagonist who navigates a world without maternal or patriarchal support. Her resilience defines her character beyond male authority.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Smile at Last?

Limited

The film seems to depict a localized, likely homogeneous social environment. There is no evidence of diverse racial or ethnic representation.

How does Smile at Last represent religion and culture?

Good

The film provides a critical look at social institutions, showing the orphanage and fragmented families as oppressive systems.

Does Smile at Last include disability representation?

Fair

The story touches on psychological trauma and emotional desensitization among the children. It is unclear if mental health issues are addressed with real ability to act.

Present on Screen

Highlights a resilient female protagonist who challenges traditional gender roles.
Offers a strong critique of institutional and state-run social structures.
Challenges the cliché of the stable, patriarchal provider through the depiction of an ineffective father.

Limited or Absent

Lacks explicit LGBTQ+ representation or queer relationships.
Shows no evidence of racial or ethnic diversity within the social setting.
Psychological trauma is present but its treatment of mental health remains unclear.

Official Synopsis

16-year-old Mari, raised without a mother by a drunkard father, is put in an orphanage which she immediately, though unsuccessfully, tries to flee from. The sensitive Mari finds it hard to adapt to the coarse manners and brutal games amongst the children. Only gradually does she develop a sense for the similarly difficult fates of her fellow sufferers, who have long forgotten how to cry. She even falls in love for the first time, not with her self-appointed “protector” Tauri, but with the rough-mannered Robi.

How are these scores produced? →