New Showbiz

You are here:
64: Part 2

64: Part 2

2016

Director

Takahisa Zeze

Runtime

119 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

1989 is the 64 Shouwa year in the Japanese calendar, thus the unsolved girl kidnapping-murder case is called "64(rokuyon)" that got up in this year in Criminal Investigation Department in the Prefectural Police Department. And 14 years were over as the prefecture's police to be unsolved greatest stain, and statute of limitations approached it. In 2002, Yoshinobu Mikami, an ex-detective who was assigned as the investigator of the "Rokuyon" case 14years ago, moves as a Public Relations Officer in the Police Affairs Department against his will. As a newly assigned Public Relations Officer, he was troubled with the relation between the reporters, new case has occurred. And that new case traced "Rokuyon" case exactly.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.8/10

Fair

Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The narrative focuses on procedural mystery and the psychological fallout of a cold case. There is no explicit evidence of LGBTQ+ character arcs or non-cisnormative identities.

Gender Representation

Fair

The plot centers on tensions within male-dominated police hierarchies. While the protagonist's missing daughter introduces themes of family vulnerability, women are not shown driving the investigation.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

Set within the Showa and Heisei eras, the film operates within a largely homogeneous Japanese social framework. It focuses on internal institutional dynamics rather than multi-ethnic intersectionality.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The film critiques traditional institutions by highlighting the rift between criminal investigation and police administration. It portrays the state bureaucracy as a source of systemic failure.

Disability Representation

Fair

There are no specific details regarding characters with visible or invisible disabilities. The protagonist's grief may touch on mental health, but no characters are explicitly characterized this way.

Strengths

  • Sophisticated critique of traditional institutions and state bureaucracy.
  • Nuanced exploration of the friction between individual morality and institutional rigidity.
  • Effective deconstruction of the police force as a monolithic entity.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lack of visible LGBTQ+ character arcs or non-cisnormative identities.
  • Limited racial and ethnic diversity within the social framework.
  • Absence of explicit representation for characters with disabilities.

AI Analysis

The film functions primarily as a systemic critique of institutional inertia. It prioritizes the friction between administrative preservation and the human necessity for justice over demographic variety. While the narrative deconstructs the idea of a monolithic police force, it lacks significant representation across several key identity categories. The focus remains heavily on Japanese institutional structures and patriarchal hierarchies. Ultimately, the work finds its strength in social critique rather than intersectional diversity, resulting in a moderate overall score.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.