You are here:

64: Part 2

Name: 64: Part 2
Director: Takahisa Zeze
Released: 2016
Duration: 119 min

Representation Score

6.8/10

Good

2016

Director

Takahisa Zeze

Runtime

119 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

The film primarily serves as a critique of institutional inertia. It emphasizes the tension between administrative preservation and the human need for justice over demographic variety. While the narrative dismantles the concept of a monolithic police force, it lacks significant representation across several key identity categories. The focus remains heavily on Japanese institutional structures and patriarchal hierarchies. Ultimately, the work excels in social critique rather than diverse representation, resulting in a moderate overall assessment.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does 64: Part 2 have LGBTQ+ representation?

Limited

The film focuses on procedural mysteries and the psychological impact of a cold case. There are no explicit LGBTQ+ character arcs or non-cisgender identities.

How does 64: Part 2 portray gender?

Fair

The story centers around tensions within male-dominated police hierarchies. Although the protagonist's missing daughter introduces themes of family vulnerability, women do not play a significant role in driving the investigation.

How racially and ethnically diverse is 64: Part 2?

Fair

Set during the Showa and Heisei periods, the film operates within a largely homogeneous Japanese social framework. It focuses on internal institutional dynamics rather than multi-ethnic diversity.

How does 64: Part 2 represent religion and culture?

Good

The film critiques traditional institutions by highlighting the conflict between criminal investigation and police administration. It portrays the state bureaucracy as a source of systemic failure.

Does 64: Part 2 include disability representation?

Fair

There are no specific details about characters with visible or invisible disabilities. The protagonist's grief might touch on mental health issues, but no characters are explicitly described as having disabilities.

Present on Screen

Sophisticated critique of traditional institutions and state bureaucracy.
Nuanced exploration of the tension between individual morality and institutional rigidity.
Effective deconstruction of the police force as a monolithic entity.

Limited or Absent

Lack of visible LGBTQ+ character arcs or non-cisgender identities.
Limited racial and ethnic diversity within the social framework.
Absence of explicit representation for characters with disabilities.

Official Synopsis

1989: 64th and last year of the Showa era. A girl is kidnapped and killed. The unsolved case is called Case 64 ('rokuyon'). 2002: Yoshinobu Mikami, who was the detective in charge of the Case 64, moves as a Public Relations Officer in the Police Affairs Department. His relation with the reporters is conflicted and his own daughter is missing. The statute of limitations for the Case 64 will expire in one year. Then a kidnapping case, similar to the Case 64, takes place. The rift between the criminal investigation department and police administration department deepens. Mikami challenges the case as a public relations secretary.

How are these scores produced? →