The film lacks any discernible LGBTQ+ characters or non-cisnormative identities. Social dynamics focus entirely on traditional romantic and class-based archetypes.

The narrative centers on the male protagonist's physical agency. While the female lead's unhappiness hints at a critique of restrictive domesticity, she remains a catalyst rather than an independent driver.

The cast is largely homogeneous, reflecting the social constraints of 1921. There is no evidence of racial blending or non-white characters in significant roles.

The film critiques rigid economic structures by framing the upper class through absurdity. It prioritizes the outsider's perspective to challenge the perceived stability of Western class institutions.

Physical clumsiness serves as a slapstick comedic device rather than a nuanced portrayal of disability. No characters with disabilities are shown possessing agency outside of comedy.