A Hand Shake
1892
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 0.9 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
Annabelle Serpentine Dance
1895
Director
William Heise, William K.L. Dickson
Runtime
1 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
In a long, diaphanous skirt, held out by her hands with arms extended, Broadway dancer Annabelle Moore performs. Her dance emphasizes the movement of the flowing cloth. She moves to her right and left across an unadorned stage. Many of the prints were distributed in hand-tinted color.
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
1.5/10
Minimal
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film is a brief, non-narrative performance piece. It lacks LGBTQ+ characters or narratives addressing non-cisnormative identities.
Gender Representation
Annabelle Moore is the central figure, showcasing professional skill and physical agency. However, the presentation aligns with 1895 aesthetic standards of femininity.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The subject is a Broadway dancer, and the visual evidence shows no diverse or non-Anglo-Saxon casting. It reflects the homogeneous demographics of the era.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
This work serves as a document of early Western entertainment culture. It functions as a standard exhibition of talent within established commercial frameworks.
Disability Representation
There is no evidence of characters with visible or invisible disabilities in this performance.
Strengths
- Highlights female physical agency and professional mastery of movement through Annabelle Moore's performance.
Areas for Improvement
- Lacks racial and ethnic diversity, reflecting the homogeneous demographic norms of the 1890s.
- Provides no representation of LGBTQ+ identities or disability.
- Does not engage with diverse cultural themes or social critiques.
AI Analysis
Produced during the early kinetoscope era, this film focuses on the technical capture of movement rather than social commentary. It serves as a historical artifact of early Western performance art rather than a narrative work. The film lacks the complexity required to engage with modern intersectional frameworks. Its primary objective was the documentation of motion, resulting in a narrow demographic focus. While it highlights a female performer's mastery, the work remains rooted in the homogeneous social norms of the late 19th-century American stage.
Similar Movies
Men Boxing
1891
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.3 out of 10
Monkeyshines, No. 1
1890
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 0.0 out of 10
Serpentine Dance
1897
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.8 out of 10
Annabelle Butterfly Dance
1894
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.1 out of 10
Annabelle Sun Dance
1894
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.9 out of 10
Die Serpentintänzerin
1895
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.2 out of 10
Crissie Sheridan
1897
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.6 out of 10
Nude Woman by Waterfall
1920
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.0 out of 10
Kodachrome Two-Color Test Shots No. III
1922
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.6 out of 10
Roundhay Garden Scene
1888
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.3 out of 10
Akrobatisches Potpourri
1895
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.0 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.