
Four Days in July
1984

1979
Director
Mike Leigh
Runtime
73 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Slice-of-life look at class divisions among employees of a brokerage house. Alan, with his portrait of the Queen and love of the peerage; his wife April, who raises cats; youthful and pretentious friends Nigel, Giles, and Anthony, who gather for a wine-soaked dinner party with the chatty and risque Samantha and the mousy Caroline; the plummy Lord and Lady Crouchurst, in a spot of bother needing the help of Francis, a senior partner, to assist with the family's cash flow. Alan comes home from work to find Mr. Shakespeare doing a photo shoot of one of April's cats and a wealthy stranger, Miss Hunt, waiting to purchase one. His instincts for sycophantic palaver kick in.
Overall Score
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film lacks explicit depictions of LGBTQ+ identities or same-sex intimacy. The narrative focuses on the social maneuvering of brokerage employees and the aristocracy, offering no overt non-heteronormative representation.
Gender Representation
Women navigate social expectations through archetypes ranging from the mousy Caroline to the risque Samantha. While April’s domestic sphere provides a counterpoint to male-dominated professional life, power structures remain traditional.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The setting reinforces a highly homogeneous, Anglo-centric social hierarchy. There is no mention of racial or ethnic diversity within the cast or the described social circles.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The story critiques Western institutions by highlighting the instability of the aristocracy. It deconstructs the idea of the upper class through the lens of sycophancy and financial struggle.
Disability Representation
There are no visible or mentioned depictions of physical or neurodivergent disabilities within the provided narrative details.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Mike Leigh’s work functions as a sociological study of class and social performance rather than a showcase of demographic breadth. The film excels at interrogating the friction between different social strata and the performative nature of status. However, the narrative is deeply limited by its homogeneity. The focus on the British peerage and brokerage culture results in a significant lack of racial, ethnic, and LGBTQ+ representation. Ultimately, the film's progressive value lies in its critique of traditional authority and class hierarchies rather than its inclusion of diverse identities.

1984

1980

1973
1979

2005

1977

1999

1994

2007

1965

2015

1976
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.