
Symbiopsychotaxiplasm: Take 2½
2005

1968
Not RatedDirector
William Greaves
Runtime
75 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
In Manhattan's Central Park, a film crew directed by William Greaves is shooting a screen test with various pairs of actors. It's a confrontation between a couple: he demands to know what's wrong, she challenges his sexual orientation. Cameras shoot the exchange, and another camera records Greaves and his crew. Sometimes we watch the crew discussing this scene, its language, and the process of making a movie. Is there such a thing as natural language? Are all things related to sex? The camera records distractions - a woman rides horseback past them; a garrulous homeless vet who sleeps in the park chats them up. What's the nature of making a movie?
Overall Score
Good
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
A female performer challenges the director's sexual orientation during a scene. This moment serves as a disruption of the director's persona rather than a sustained exploration of queer identity.
Gender Representation
The film avoids common 1960s tropes of submissive femininity by focusing on intellectual and technical processes. Gendered power dynamics are often subsumed by the broader meta-narrative of the crew and actors.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
This work is an exceptional example of racial agency. By featuring a Black director and an all-Black cast, it disrupts the historical exclusion of Black professionals from behind-the-lens roles.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film prioritizes postmodern subjectivity and the deconstruction of truth over singular moral frameworks. It critiques the authority of objective perspectives through a sophisticated, non-traditional approach to storytelling.
Disability Representation
There are no significant depictions of visible or invisible disabilities that function as central narrative drivers in this work.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
William Greaves' masterpiece is a radical deconstruction of the cinematic gaze. Its most profound achievement is the subversion of racial hierarchies, placing Black professionals in positions of technical and creative authority during an era of systemic exclusion. The film's meta-cinematic structure uses identity as a tool for interrogation. While it touches on sexual orientation and gendered power, these elements often serve the broader ontological study of filmmaking rather than dedicated character studies. Ultimately, the work succeeds by turning the camera on the process of creation itself. It challenges the stability of truth and identity, making it a vital study of agency and the medium.

2005

2010

1980

2015

1998

2003

1976

2011

1986

1997

2003

1996
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.