New Showbiz

You are here:
Symbiopsychotaxiplasm: Take One

Symbiopsychotaxiplasm: Take One

1968

Not Rated

Director

William Greaves

Runtime

75 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

In Manhattan's Central Park, a film crew directed by William Greaves is shooting a screen test with various pairs of actors. It's a confrontation between a couple: he demands to know what's wrong, she challenges his sexual orientation. Cameras shoot the exchange, and another camera records Greaves and his crew. Sometimes we watch the crew discussing this scene, its language, and the process of making a movie. Is there such a thing as natural language? Are all things related to sex? The camera records distractions - a woman rides horseback past them; a garrulous homeless vet who sleeps in the park chats them up. What's the nature of making a movie?

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

6.7/10

Good


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Fair

A female performer challenges the director's sexual orientation during a scene. This moment serves as a disruption of the director's persona rather than a sustained exploration of queer identity.

Gender Representation

Fair

The film avoids common 1960s tropes of submissive femininity by focusing on intellectual and technical processes. Gendered power dynamics are often subsumed by the broader meta-narrative of the crew and actors.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Excellent

This work is an exceptional example of racial agency. By featuring a Black director and an all-Black cast, it disrupts the historical exclusion of Black professionals from behind-the-lens roles.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The film prioritizes postmodern subjectivity and the deconstruction of truth over singular moral frameworks. It critiques the authority of objective perspectives through a sophisticated, non-traditional approach to storytelling.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There are no significant depictions of visible or invisible disabilities that function as central narrative drivers in this work.

Strengths

  • Exceptional racial agency through a Black director and all-Black professional cast.
  • Sophisticated disruption of traditional 1960s gender tropes and hierarchies.
  • Radical meta-cinematic structure that interrogates the nature of identity and truth.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks a sustained or character-driven narrative dedicated to LGBTQ+ identities.
  • Gendered dynamics are often secondary to the broader meta-narrative of filmmaking.
  • Does not provide explicit depictions of disability within the narrative.

AI Analysis

William Greaves' masterpiece is a radical deconstruction of the cinematic gaze. Its most profound achievement is the subversion of racial hierarchies, placing Black professionals in positions of technical and creative authority during an era of systemic exclusion. The film's meta-cinematic structure uses identity as a tool for interrogation. While it touches on sexual orientation and gendered power, these elements often serve the broader ontological study of filmmaking rather than dedicated character studies. Ultimately, the work succeeds by turning the camera on the process of creation itself. It challenges the stability of truth and identity, making it a vital study of agency and the medium.

How are these scores produced? →

Similar Movies

Movie poster for Symbiopsychotaxiplasm: Take 2½

Symbiopsychotaxiplasm: Take 2½

2005

No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 6.7 out of 10

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.