
Long Live Robin Hood
1971

1967
Director
C.M. Pennington-Richards
Runtime
92 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
After being falsely accused of murder, Sir Robin of Loxley takes refuge in the untamed wilderness of Sherwood Forest where he stumbles across a group of outlaws. Although initially suspicious of the aristocrat's motives, the men are soon won over by his integrity and prowess and Robin transforms them into a formidable fighting force, stealing from the rich and giving to the poor. As word of his fame and valour spreads, a legend is born.
Overall Score
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film follows conventional heteronormative patterns typical of 1960s adventure media. Character dynamics center on traditional romantic archetypes without any non-cisnormative identities.
Gender Representation
Traditional gender hierarchies dominate the narrative. While Maid Marian is a central figure, her agency is defined by her relationship to Robin, leaving women in reactive roles.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
Casting is homogeneous, reflecting the era's tendency toward a strictly Anglo-Saxon depiction of medieval England. The primary ensemble lacks racial blending or non-white characters.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The story critiques institutional corruption by framing wealth redistribution as a moral necessity. This folk-hero trope challenges legal authority without offering a systemic critique of Western institutions.
Disability Representation
The narrative lacks characters with visible or invisible disabilities. The focus remains strictly on physical prowess and the martial capabilities of able-bodied heroes.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
A Challenge for Robin Hood is a quintessential mid-century British adventure that prioritizes classical heroism over social subversion. It adheres to the era's established conventions, focusing on linear moral structures and traditional archetypes. The film's primary strength lies in its thematic exploration of social justice. By depicting the struggle against a corrupt Sheriff, it provides a moral critique of institutional tyranny through the lens of a folk legend. However, the production is limited by the casting and social norms of 1967. It lacks intersectional complexity, offering a homogeneous view of medieval England that excludes diverse identities and non-white characters.

1971
1994

1952

1964

1961

1949

2006

1953

1966

1953

1969

1987
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.