
The U.S. vs. John Lennon
2006

2010
Director
Michael Epstein
Runtime
115 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
This documentary takes an intimate look at the time Lennon, Yoko Ono and their son, Sean, spent living in New York City during the 1970s. It features never-before heard studio recordings from the Double Fantasy sessions and never-before-seen outtakes from Lennon in concert and home movies that have only recently been transferred to video. It also features exclusive interviews with Ms. Ono, who cooperated extensively with the production and offers an unprecedented level of access, as well as with artists who worked closely with Lennon during this period, including Elton John and photographer Bob Gruen (who took the iconic photograph of Lennon in front of the skyline wearing a “New York City” T-shirt).
Overall Score
Good
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film focuses on the Lennon-Ono family unit rather than queer narratives. While it captures the 1970s counterculture era, it lacks explicit depictions of non-heteronormative identities.
Gender Representation
Yoko Ono is presented as a primary agent and collaborator rather than a peripheral figure. The film challenges the 'muse' trope by granting her significant agency and intellectual equality.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The subjects reflect the demographic realities of a specific 1970s Western creative class. While set in a culturally diverse New York, the primary focus remains on a predominantly white circle.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The documentary excels by deconstructing traditional celebrity structures and prioritizing personal truth. It captures an anti-establishment spirit that departs from polished, institutionalized rock star imagery.
Disability Representation
There is no documented evidence regarding the portrayal of physical or neurodivergent disabilities within the film.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
LennoNYC avoids the typical pitfalls of music hagiography by shifting the focus from a singular male icon to a complex domestic partnership. It utilizes high-access archival material to humanize its subjects, moving beyond the polished image of a rock star to explore private, domestic realities. The film's strength lies in its refusal to treat Yoko Ono as a secondary character. By centering her perspective and agency, the narrative disrupts traditional patriarchal biographical tropes often found in the genre. However, the film remains anchored in a specific, predominantly white cultural milieu of the 1970s. While it captures the spirit of counterculture, it does not explicitly engage with broader racial intersectionality or LGBTQ+ identities.

2006

2005

2016

2012

2010

2010

2018

2012

2005

2007

1990

2007
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.