You are here:

The Urban Crisis and the New Militants: Module 7 - Cicero March

The Urban Crisis and the New Militants: Module 7 - Cicero March

Representation Score

6.0/10

Good

1966

Director

Mike Gray, Bill Cottle

Runtime

8 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

This documentary critically examines systemic power dynamics and the breakdown of mid-century social cohesion. It excels by highlighting racial justice and the struggles of underrepresented groups against systemic racism and imperialism. However, the film's scope is limited in terms of LGBTQ+ representation and multi-layered identities. It also lacks specific detail about gendered character arcs and the portrayal of disabilities.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does The Urban Crisis and the New Militants: Module 7 - Cicero March have LGBTQ+ representation?

Fair

The film doesn't provide clear examples of non-binary or same-sex relationships. Instead, it focuses on political activism and racial tensions.

How does The Urban Crisis and the New Militants: Module 7 - Cicero March portray gender?

Fair

The film highlights young activists moving away from traditional domestic roles into political arenas. It challenges traditional patriarchal structures without detailing specific character arcs.

How racially and ethnically diverse is The Urban Crisis and the New Militants: Module 7 - Cicero March?

Excellent

The film centers on characters of color and their struggles against systemic racism. It gives a significant role in driving the story to those typically excluded from mainstream political narratives.

How does The Urban Crisis and the New Militants: Module 7 - Cicero March represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The film critiques imperialism and democratic liberalism from the perspective of political dissidents. It prioritizes the voices of those challenging traditional Western views.

Does The Urban Crisis and the New Militants: Module 7 - Cicero March include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no specific information about the portrayal of physical or neurodivergent disabilities in the film.

Present on Screen

  • Centers racial justice and the systemic struggles of underrepresented groups.
  • Gives a significant role in driving the story to those typically excluded from mainstream political narratives.
  • Challenges mainstream narratives through the lens of political dissidents.

Limited or Absent

  • Lacks explicit representation or evidence regarding LGBTQ+ identities.
  • Limited detail regarding specific gendered character arcs or characters who reflect more than one aspect of diversity.
  • No information concerning the portrayal of physical or neurodivergent disabilities.

Official Synopsis

For a generation of young activists, the reality of war, imperialism, racism and the growing fragility of democratic liberalism was too much to handle. Force became a means to wrestle with this tension. As the discourse of a “country torn” finds its way into mainstream political analyses (for many the deep divisions in this country are not a new political reality), we should reflect on the writings of political dissidents and radicals. We should recognize the diversity of political analysis that is very much alive. The histories of armed struggle, if taken seriously, provide us with a means to think more critically about the center, and complicate its claims of moral and political right.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.