You are here:

The Roses of the Desert

The Roses of the Desert

Representation Score

5.4/10

Fair

2006

Not Rated

Director

Mario Monicelli

Runtime

102 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Mario Monicelli’s war comedy functions as a revisionist critique of the 1940 North African campaign. It challenges traditional Fascist propaganda by contrasting state-mandated military objectives with the humanitarian realities of a sanitary battalion. The film achieves its strength by deconstructing colonial hierarchies. By shifting the focus from conquest to aid, the story gives real power to the Libyan population and prioritizes human feelings over rigid institutional loyalty. While the film excels in cultural and racial subversion, it lacks representation regarding gender and LGBTQ+ identities. The focus remains heavily on traditionally male-dominated roles within the military and missionary structures.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does The Roses of the Desert have LGBTQ+ representation?

Fair

The film does not include any LGBTQ+ characters or explore non-straight relationships. The story focuses on the interactions between the Italian military and the local Libyan population.

How does The Roses of the Desert portray gender?

Fair

The story centers on a military battalion and a missionary, roles traditionally held by men. However, the film's critique of hyper-masculine military pursuits hints at a softer approach to traditional male roles.

How racially and ethnically diverse is The Roses of the Desert?

Good

The film centers on the Libyan population, challenging conventional conqueror clichés. By framing the occupation through a humanitarian lens, the local population is depicted who play a significant role in driving the story rather than as background elements.

How does The Roses of the Desert represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The narrative prioritizes humanitarianism over nationalistic duty, critiquing Fascist institutions. The tension between the missionary's mission and state objectives highlights a preference for localized moral frameworks over institutional corruption.

Does The Roses of the Desert include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no mention of characters with visible or invisible disabilities within the provided narrative details.

Present on Screen

  • Effectively deconstructs colonial and Fascist hierarchies through a humanitarian lens.
  • Grants a significant role in driving the story to the Libyan population, moving beyond mere background roles.
  • Strong critique of state institutions in favor of situational ethics and humanism.

Limited or Absent

  • Lacks visible LGBTQ+ representation or exploration of non-straight relationships.
  • Limited gender diversity, focusing on traditionally male military roles.
  • No representation of characters with visible or invisible disabilities.

Official Synopsis

A sanitary battalion of Italian Army is sent to Sorman oasis in Lybia during the Africa campaign in 1940. Soon an Italian missionary, living nearby, succeed to transform the occupation by Italian Army in a kind of humanitarian mission. In fact all the battalion is involved to help the local population. The war anyway goes on with no regards to human feelings. The "glorious" Fascist campaign is going to became a fast retreat.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.