You are here:
En man för mycket

En man för mycket

1941

15

Director

Gösta Stevens

Runtime

73 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Julius Berge has an advertising firm in Stockholm together with his wife Sonja. The man with the ideas is their colleague Kurt Dal, who used to be engaged to Sonja. Their ménage à trois becomes a crazy mix of jealousy and misunderstanding.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

2.8/10

Limited


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The film explores a ménage à trois involving a husband, wife, and former fiancé. However, the plot centers on heterosexual jealousy rather than non-cisnormative identities.

Gender Representation

Fair

The story uses a traditional romantic conflict between Sonja and Kurt Dal. While the three-person dynamic disrupts the nuclear family, it relies on conventional gendered tropes.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Minimal

The production reflects the demographic homogeneity of 1941 Stockholm. There is no evidence of diverse casting or characters that challenge the era's social norms.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Limited

The narrative focuses on individual romantic complications and interpersonal dysfunction. It avoids broader critiques of Western institutions, religion, or systemic social structures.

Disability Representation

Minimal

The film provides no mention of characters with visible or invisible disabilities.

Strengths

  • The ménage à trois setup provides a departure from standard monogamous romantic structures.

Areas for Improvement

  • The film lacks representation for LGBTQ+ identities and non-cisnormative characters.
  • There is a notable absence of racial and ethnic diversity within the cast.
  • The narrative relies on traditional gendered tropes rather than subverting hierarchies.
  • The story lacks any depiction of characters with disabilities.

AI Analysis

En man för mycket is a period-specific comedy that leans heavily on the social conventions of 1941. While the central plot introduces a non-traditional romantic structure through a ménage à trois, the film remains anchored in traditional interpersonal dynamics. The narrative lacks intersectional depth and fails to provide agency to marginalized groups. Instead, it focuses on the jealousy and misunderstandings of a central trio, functioning as a character-driven comedy rather than a tool for social critique. Ultimately, the film operates within the conventional frameworks of its era, offering little disruption to the status quo regarding gender, race, or identity.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.