When the Woman Butts In
1960
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.0 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
The Man Who Walked Through the Wall
1959
Director
Ladislao Vajda
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Mr. Buchsbaum, third class taxes employee, lives a peaceful life until the new chief immediately criticizes his work. His only confort is his stamps collection. Sadly, even this consolation and his peace are threatened by a new, charming, neighbour who teaches piano. Increasingly infuriated, he discovers accidentally one evening that he has the ability to go through walls. With this power, he decides to settle the scores, firstly with his boss who downgraded him.
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
4.1/10
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film lacks explicit LGBTQ+ characters or narratives. The plot centers on traditional romantic and social frameworks typical of the era.
Gender Representation
The story focuses on a male protagonist's professional and domestic struggles. While a female neighbor appears, she serves primarily as a catalyst for the man's conflict.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The production reflects the demographic homogeneity of 1959 Europe. There is no evidence of multicultural casting or intentional racial diversity in the narrative.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film offers a critique of rigid Western bureaucracy and capitalism. It uses magical realism to challenge institutional authority and professional hierarchies.
Disability Representation
The protagonist's ability to walk through walls acts as a non-standard physical capability. This provides a unique form of agency, though it is not a traditional disability depiction.
Strengths
- Subtle subversion of institutional authority and rigid social hierarchies.
- Use of magical realism to empower the individual against bureaucratic systems.
Areas for Improvement
- Lack of diverse representation regarding race, gender, and sexual orientation.
- Reliance on traditional social frameworks and demographic homogeneity.
AI Analysis
The film is a character-driven comedy that prioritizes individual agency over systemic rigidity. Its primary strength lies in its subtle subversion of mid-century institutional authority through magical realism. However, the work lacks modern intersectional markers. It adheres to the demographic and social norms of its time, offering little representation regarding race, gender equality, or sexual orientation. Ultimately, the film functions more as a social critique of bureaucracy than a diverse ensemble piece, focusing on the personal struggle against impersonal structures.
Similar Movies
The Right-Minded Madman
1968
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.5 out of 10
Evil Thoughts
1976
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.9 out of 10
Adventures of a Dentist
1967
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.7 out of 10
The Career of Nikos Dyzma
2002
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.1 out of 10
The Man with the Balloons
1967
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.7 out of 10
The Little Apartment
1959
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.0 out of 10
Tight Skin
1982
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.7 out of 10
The Sleepwalker
1951
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.9 out of 10
Bright Personality
1989
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.2 out of 10
The Rocket from Calabuch
1956
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.4 out of 10
Mon Oncle
1958
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.2 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.