
The Robber Cries Thief!
1965

1965
Director
Andreas Andreadakis, Giannis Dalianidis
Runtime
84 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Two naughty men, Iordanis and Potis, are partners in a drug- industry. Potis is a great womanizer, given that, even though he is married to the main financier of the business, Amalia, he doesn’t hesitate to cheat on her. One day, Tilemachos runs in a hurry into his office, looking for a job. Clever as he is, he suspects at once the ongoing situation and threatens to reveal everything to Amalia.
Overall Score
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The narrative focuses on heteronormative dynamics centered on marriage and infidelity. There is no evidence of non-cisnormative identities or critiques of traditional romantic structures.
Gender Representation
Male protagonists drive the plot through business and romantic pursuits. While Amalia holds economic power as a financier, she primarily serves as a catalyst for male deception.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The film depicts a homogeneous social environment typical of its era. There is no indication of multi-ethnic casting or diverse ethnic representation within the narrative.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The story centers on individualistic greed and personal morality within an illicit business. It lacks a broader critique of systemic institutions or cultural diversity.
Disability Representation
The film provides no information or visible representation regarding characters with physical or neurodivergent disabilities.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
A Very Clever Guy is a product of mid-century Greek comedy, adhering strictly to the social hierarchies and narrative conventions of 1965. The film relies on established tropes of male sexual agency and marital infidelity to drive its plot. The characters operate within a homogeneous social framework that lacks ethnic or LGBTQ+ diversity. While women hold certain economic roles, they remain tethered to traditional gendered conflicts involving male protagonists. Ultimately, the film functions as a character-driven comedy focused on situational ethics rather than a disruption of social roles or identity politics.

1965

1954

1981

1977

1981

1973

1954

1964

1939

1966

1962

1968
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.