New Showbiz

You are here:
Friday the Thirteenth

Friday the Thirteenth

1933

Director

Victor Saville

Runtime

89 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

It is pouring with rain at one minute to midnight on Friday the thirteenth, and the driver of a London bus is peering through his blurred windscreen as his vehicle sails down an empty road. Suddenly, lightning strikes, and a vast crane above topples into the path of the oncoming bus... Then Big Ben begins to wind backwards. Time recedes. And we discover the lives of all the passengers and the events that brought them to that late-night bus journey, from the con-man with a hundred-pound cheque to the businessman's distraught and elderly wife. Time flows on, inevitably, to the crash -- and past it, as some live and some die.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

3.4/10

Limited

Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The film lacks evidence of non-heteronormative identities or same-sex intimacy. The narrative focuses on established social roles typical of 1933 British cinema.

Gender Representation

Fair

Female characters, such as the businessman's distraught wife, appear defined by their emotional states and relationships to men. This suggests female agency may be secondary to male-driven arcs.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The story likely reflects the demographic homogeneity of 1930s London. The narrative architecture prioritizes a localized, Western social hierarchy without explicit ethnic diversity.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Fair

The film explores urban complexities through crime and commerce. While it touches on social fringes like the criminal underworld, it remains rooted in early 20th-century social mores.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no indication of characters with visible or invisible disabilities within the narrative.

Strengths

  • The non-linear narrative structure provides a sophisticated look at social interconnectedness.
  • The ensemble cast allows for an examination of various social strata, from criminals to the upper-middle class.

Areas for Improvement

  • The film relies on traditional gender archetypes that limit female agency.
  • The narrative lacks representation of LGBTQ+ identities or diverse ethnic backgrounds.
  • There is no evidence of characters with disabilities being included in the story.

AI Analysis

Victor Saville’s 1933 drama is a structural experiment that uses a reverse-chronological lens to examine a cross-section of London society. By deconstructing the lives of passengers leading up to a bus crash, the film creates a social tapestry of various classes. However, this complexity is primarily temporal rather than identity-based. The film operates within the traditional demographic and social boundaries of its era, focusing on established archetypes like the con-man and the businessman. While the ensemble approach offers a wide view of human experience, it does not subvert systemic hierarchies or introduce diverse identities beyond the standard social strata of the time.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.