You are here:

Trio

Trio

Representation Score

2.0/10

Limited

1950

Not Rated

Director

Harold French, Ken Annakin

Runtime

91 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Trio (1950) is a traditional character study based on the cynical views of W. Somerset Maugham. The film focuses on individual psychological issues and the exposure of social hypocrisy rather than addressing broader societal inequalities. While the source material provides a basis for examining the erosion of conventional morality, the production is limited by the cinematic standards of the 1950s. This leads to a narrative that emphasizes psychological realism over diverse representation. Overall, the film serves as a typical drama of its time. It lacks the varied identities and cultural disruptions needed for a higher diversity rating.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Trio have LGBTQ+ representation?

Limited

The film does not show any clear representations of LGBTQ+ identities or same-sex relationships. Given the time period, these themes might be absent or hidden.

How does Trio portray gender?

Fair

The movie explores complicated personal relationships and human flaws. While it may question traditional family structures, it still follows the gender roles typical of the era.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Trio?

Minimal

The film sticks to the standard casting practices of the mid-20th century. There is no significant representation of non-white characters in the main story.

How does Trio represent religion and culture?

Limited

The film offers a detailed look at personal morality and ethics. However, it doesn't challenge institutional norms and stays within the social boundaries of its time.

Does Trio include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no clear indication of characters with physical or neurodevelopmental disabilities in the film.

Present on Screen

  • The source material offers a sophisticated exploration of complex human ethics and social hypocrisy.

Limited or Absent

  • The film lacks representation of LGBTQ+ identities, racial diversity, and characters with disabilities.
  • The narrative remains confined to the homogeneous social and casting norms of the 1950s.

Official Synopsis

W. Somerset Maugham introduces three more of his stories about human foibles.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.