
Skin of Roses
1978

1994
Director
Tatsumi Kumashiro
Runtime
123 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Tanaka is a yakuza who collects 'protection money' from establishments. He has just been released from jail, where he had spent eight years, and finds out that his boss wants to get rid of him. Tanaka is not an archetypal yakuza; he travels by public transport. But he does have two mistresses: Ayumi, who runs a nightclub, and Yoshie, a brothel-keeper. When Tanaka's boss ends up in hospital, second man Kurauchi exerts increasing pressure on Tanaka. Tanaka deliberately has himself wounded by a fighter to dodge several of Kurauchi's demands.
Overall Score
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film centers on a male protagonist and his relationships with two female mistresses. While it explores non-traditional domestic arrangements, there is no explicit evidence of queer-coded identities.
Gender Representation
Women in the film possess significant agency, operating as a nightclub owner and a brothel-keeper. This subverts traditional patriarchal hierarchies by focusing on women navigating complex power dynamics.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The production features a culturally homogeneous cast within the Japanese Yakuza underworld. It offers a deep, localized exploration of specific Japanese subcultures rather than intersectional racial blending.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The narrative critiques institutional stability and traditional authority through the lens of a social outcast. It challenges rigid hierarchies and conventional societal structures via a focus on transient lifestyles.
Disability Representation
There is no evidence of neurodivergent or physical disability representation. The protagonist's self-inflicted wound serves as a tactical narrative device rather than a character study of disability.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Tatsumi Kumashiro’s direction brings a history of exploring marginalized social strata and transgressive sexuality to this drama. The film succeeds in subverting traditional social hierarchies by centering characters on the periphery of mainstream society. While the cast is culturally homogeneous, the film provides a nuanced look at the Japanese shadow economy. It moves away from submissive feminine tropes, instead presenting women with economic and social agency. However, the film lacks explicit LGBTQ+ representation and does not engage with disability as a character identity. It remains a localized study of specific criminal and social subcultures.

1978

1999

1969

2016

1960

2012

1994

1985

2014

2014

1948

2006
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.