You are here:
The Best of Everything

The Best of Everything

1959

Approved

Director

Jean Negulesco

Runtime

121 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

An exposé of the lives and loves of Madison Avenue working girls and their higher-ups.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

2.7/10

Limited


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film follows a strictly heteronormative narrative structure. There is no presence of non-cisnormative identities or same-sex intimacy within the character arcs.

Gender Representation

Fair

The story centers on female agency and professional ambition in a competitive urban setting. However, characters must still navigate male-dominated hierarchies to find fulfillment.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Minimal

The ensemble is predominantly white, reflecting the homogeneous social landscape of 1950s Madison Avenue. The film lacks engagement with non-Anglo-Saxon perspectives.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Limited

The film portrays the pursuit of professional success within mid-century Western values. It upholds conventional social orders rather than critiquing established institutions.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no representation of physical, sensory, or neurodivergent disabilities. Characters are depicted through a lens of conventional physical ability.

Strengths

  • The film explores female agency by centering its plot on women's professional ambitions and career trajectories.
  • It moves beyond purely domestic roles, allowing female protagonists to drive the narrative through personal autonomy.

Areas for Improvement

  • The film lacks racial and ethnic diversity, presenting a largely homogeneous white ensemble.
  • There is no representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-cisnormative gender expressions.
  • The narrative fails to include characters with physical, sensory, or neurodivergent disabilities.

AI Analysis

The film serves as a period-typical melodrama that offers a glimpse into female professional life. While it provides more agency to women than many contemporary films, it remains limited by the social and demographic homogeneity of the late 1950s. Its focus on career trajectories provides a progressive edge for the era, yet the narrative fails to include diverse racial, ethnic, or LGBTQ+ identities. The production adheres closely to the established social hierarchies of mid-century Hollywood.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.