New Showbiz

You are here:
The Rich Are Always with Us

The Rich Are Always with Us

1932

NR

Director

Alfred E. Green

Runtime

71 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

A wealthy couple's marriage is falling apart due to the man's infidelity. The wife's male friend has long loved her and sees his big opportunity.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

2.8/10

Limited


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The narrative focuses exclusively on heteronormative romantic structures. The plot centers on marriage, infidelity, and traditional courtship. No queer subtext or non-cisnormative identities are present.

Gender Representation

Fair

Caroline Grannard demonstrates agency by confronting her husband and navigating a divorce. While she shows intellectual autonomy, her value remains tied to the 'woman in crisis' trope.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Minimal

The film features a homogeneous, Anglo-Saxon socialite cast. There is no indication of racial blending or non-white protagonists within the New York and European settings.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Limited

The story operates within traditional Western social structures. It uses high society as a backdrop for melodrama rather than critiquing capitalism or Western institutions.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no mention of characters with physical or neurodivergent disabilities. No assessment can be made regarding this category.

Strengths

  • The female protagonist, Caroline Grannard, exercises significant agency by confronting infidelity and pursuing a divorce.
  • The film provides a degree of emotional and intellectual autonomy for its lead woman, challenging era-specific passivity.

Areas for Improvement

  • The narrative lacks racial and ethnic diversity, focusing on a homogeneous Anglo-Saxon cast.
  • The story adheres strictly to heteronormative romantic structures with no queer representation.
  • The plot remains anchored in traditional social mores and Western high-society tropes.

AI Analysis

The film is a standard Pre-Code romantic drama that prioritizes personal melodrama over social critique. While it offers a degree of agency to its female lead, the narrative remains tethered to traditional hierarchies. Its primary strength lies in its moderate subversion of gender roles through a protagonist who navigates divorce and independence. However, this is offset by a lack of intersectional breadth. The production lacks racial, cultural, or LGBTQ+ diversity, focusing instead on a homogeneous upper-class experience. It functions more as a study of romantic stability than a disruption of social norms.

How are these scores produced? →

Similar Movies

Movie poster for Dangerous

Dangerous

1935

No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.3 out of 10

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.