You are here:

Doctor Who: Resurrection of the Daleks

Doctor Who: Resurrection of the Daleks

Representation Score

4.0/10

Fair

1984

Director

Matthew Robinson

Runtime

100 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Resurrection of the Daleks follows a traditional science fiction format that aligns with the demographic and social norms of its time. While it introduces minor disruptions through female assertiveness, it largely adheres to established genre conventions. The production heavily relies on familiar sci-fi clichés, such as the struggle against an existential threat, rather than exploring diverse identities. This results in a narrative that feels culturally and socially conventional. Overall, the film lacks diverse casting and complex representation needed to transcend its 1980s context. It remains focused on the character-driven conflict between the Doctor and Davros without broader social exploration.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Doctor Who: Resurrection of the Daleks have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film does not include any LGBTQ+ characters or depict non-straight relationships. Social interactions follow traditional heterosexual norms typical of the 1980s.

How does Doctor Who: Resurrection of the Daleks portray gender?

Fair

Tegan asserts herself and challenges the Doctor's authority, but her role is still tied to the gender dynamics and personal conflicts of the era.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Doctor Who: Resurrection of the Daleks?

Limited

The cast is mainly white, reflecting the social norms of 1984. Although Tegan has Greek heritage, the production does not feature a diverse or layered cast.

How does Doctor Who: Resurrection of the Daleks represent religion and culture?

Limited

The story centers on surviving against the Daleks and Davros, focusing more on survival than cultural critique. Moral choices are presented as a simple conflict between ethics and nihilism.

Does Doctor Who: Resurrection of the Daleks include disability representation?

Minimal

The film does not focus on visible or invisible disabilities. Characters are defined by their roles in the conflict rather than by neurodivergence or physical limitations.

Present on Screen

  • Tegan challenges the Doctor's authority and asserts herself throughout the film.
  • The narrative explores ethical questions related to power and technology.

Limited or Absent

  • The cast lacks racial and ethnic diversity, remaining primarily white.
  • There is no meaningful representation of neurodivergence or physical disabilities.
  • The film does not include any LGBTQ+ characters or non-straight relationships.
  • The story lacks multi-layered complexity and broader social critique.

Official Synopsis

Captured in a time corridor, the Doctor and his companions are forced to land on 20th century Earth, diverted by the Doctor's oldest enemy - the Daleks. It is here the true purpose of the time corridor becomes apparent: after ninety years of imprisonment, Davros, the ruthless creator of the Daleks, is to be liberated to assist in the resurrection of his army. Not even the Daleks foresee the poisonous threat of their creator. Indeed, who would suspect Davros of wanting to destroy his own Daleks - and why? Only the Doctor knows the truth. Will he descend to Davros' level of evil to stop him?

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.