You are here:
It Seemed Like a Good Idea at the Time

It Seemed Like a Good Idea at the Time

1975

PG

Director

John Trent

Runtime

90 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Sweeney is a playwright on a career decline. He spends much of his time wheedling money and beer out of his artistic friend Moriarty. One of his few highlights is weekly sex with his ex-wife Georgia. She is remarried to a rich but vile construction developer, but Sweeney and Gorgina are still in love.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.0/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The film lacks explicit evidence of LGBTQ+ characters or non-heteronormative identities. The narrative focuses on a central romantic entanglement between the protagonist and his ex-wife.

Gender Representation

Fair

Gendered power dynamics are explored through a protagonist in professional decline. While the central romance remains somewhat conventional, the female lead maintains agency through her emotional connections.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The narrative appears to focus on a specific artistic and bohemian social stratum. There is no indication of a diverse cast or the presence of non-white characters.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The film critiques traditional Western institutions by framing wealth and industry as potentially corrupt. It prioritizes bohemian values over capitalist stability and social hierarchies.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no mention of characters navigating physical or neurodivergent disabilities within the narrative.

Strengths

  • Subverts the 'successful male lead' trope by depicting a protagonist in professional and personal decline.
  • Critiques patriarchal wealth and capitalist stability by framing the wealthy developer as a vile figure.
  • Offers a nuanced exploration of interpersonal agency and subjective morality within a bohemian social context.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks visible intersectional breadth, showing no evidence of racial or ethnic diversity.
  • Maintains a traditional heteronormative framework with no explicit LGBTQ+ representation.
  • Provides no representation or mention of characters navigating physical or neurodivergent disabilities.

AI Analysis

The film serves as a cynical character study centered on social and economic disillusionment. It avoids presenting an idealized version of 1970s social structures, opting instead for a nuanced exploration of interpersonal agency. While the film lacks significant breakthroughs in racial or LGBTQ+ representation, it finds depth by deconstructing the 'successful man' archetype. The narrative uses its protagonist's decline to challenge traditional hierarchies. Ultimately, the film's impact comes from its critical lens toward the corruptive influence of wealth and its skepticism toward established social standing.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.