The Bottom Line
1976
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.3 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
The Debauched Life of Gerard Floque
1987
Director
Georges Lautner
Runtime
85 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
On the day he loses his job in advertising agency, Gérard Floque returns home to find that his infant daughter has been arrested for drugs trafficking and his wife is having an affair with a TV presenter. Gérard's only comfort in this time of mid-life crisis is his colleague, a young punk girl named Martine.
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
4.0/10
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film focuses on a traditional extramarital affair. There is no explicit evidence of LGBTQ+ characters or non-heteronormative identities within the narrative.
Gender Representation
The story subverts domestic tropes by portraying a wife with agency through infidelity. Martine, a punk girl, provides a counter-narrative to conventional feminine social expectations.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The narrative appears to center on a localized, homogeneous social unit. There is no indication of non-white or intersectional racial dynamics in the cast.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film critiques Western institutions by framing the family and professional spheres as sites of instability. It offers a cynical view of traditional social contracts.
Disability Representation
There is no evidence of characters with visible or invisible disabilities included in the work.
Strengths
- Subverts traditional gender roles by portraying a wife with agency and a male lead in a state of helplessness.
- Challenges the sanctity of the nuclear family and capitalist employment through a cynical, non-idealized lens.
- Introduces characters like Martine who operate outside of conventional feminine social expectations.
Areas for Improvement
- Lacks engagement with LGBTQ+ identities or non-heteronormative narratives.
- Shows no evidence of racial or ethnic diversity within the social unit.
- Provides no representation for characters with visible or invisible disabilities.
AI Analysis
The film serves as a critique of mid-century social stability rather than a tool for intersectional representation. It finds its footing by deconstructing the pillars of Western identity, such as career and family, through the lens of a protagonist in total systemic failure. While the narrative successfully disrupts traditional gender hierarchies and challenges the sanctity of the nuclear family, it remains limited in scope. The focus stays within a homogeneous social framework, lacking engagement with broader diversity metrics. Ultimately, the work uses social dysfunction to challenge societal expectations, but it does not extend this critique to include racial, LGBTQ+, or disability-related perspectives.
Similar Movies
My Other Husband
1983
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.4 out of 10
Happy Easter
1984
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.5 out of 10
The Divorce
1970
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.1 out of 10
E-love
2011
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.7 out of 10
Black Balls
2009
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.3 out of 10
Magic Touch
1983
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.8 out of 10
Hello-Goodbye
1970
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.7 out of 10
France Boutique
2003
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.6 out of 10
Courage fuyons
1979
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.7 out of 10
Rat Race
1980
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.4 out of 10
Erotissimo
1969
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.1 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.