You are here:

Boys Will Be Boys

Boys Will Be Boys

Representation Score

0.6/10

Minimal

1935

Not Rated

Director

William Beaudine

Runtime

80 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Boys Will Be Boys is a product of its time, functioning as a standard period comedy that reinforces traditional social hierarchies. The narrative prioritizes established comedic clichés of the 1930s over expanding demographic scope. The film maintains a homogeneous cast and a strictly straight-centered framework, lacking the intention to disrupt conventional expectations regarding race, gender, or identity. It focuses on institutional mischief and male-centric dynamics, reflecting the limited social perspectives of mid-1930s cinema.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Boys Will Be Boys have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film does not include any queer narratives or non-cisgender identities. It follows a traditional structure that assumes everyone is straight and cisgender.

How does Boys Will Be Boys portray gender?

Limited

The film is dominated by male-centric authority and adolescent dynamics. Female characters mostly play supporting or reactive roles, despite Lady Dorking holding institutional power.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Boys Will Be Boys?

Minimal

The cast is uniform, reflecting the standards of 1935 cinema. The British boarding school setting emphasizes traditional, Anglo-centric social norms without diverse ethnic perspectives.

How does Boys Will Be Boys represent religion and culture?

Limited

The plot adheres to conventional social structures and moral boundaries. It focuses on institutional stability and comedic mischief rather than critiquing Western institutions or social norms.

Does Boys Will Be Boys include disability representation?

Minimal

There are no characters with visible or invisible disabilities. The cast consists of able-bodied individuals, and disability is not a central theme.

Present on Screen

  • Lady Dorking offers a rare instance of female institutional authority within the Board of Governors.

Limited or Absent

  • The film lacks racial and ethnic diversity, presenting a homogeneous, Anglo-centric cast.
  • There is no representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-cisgender narratives.
  • The narrative fails to include characters with visible or invisible disabilities.
  • Female characters are relegated to secondary roles, overshadowed by male-centric dynamics.

Official Synopsis

Alec Smart, who is engaged teaching in a prison, applies for the job of headmaster at a nearby public school to replace the previous headmaster who has been convicted of writing forged cheques and has just been sent to prison. Smart appeals to the Governor to write him a good reference which he pretends to. Afterwards he writes his real recommendation which is very negative about Smart's talents. The trustee who works as the Governor's secretary, Faker Brown, "accidentally" gets the two letters mixed up and delivers the one praising Smart. On the basis of the letter, Lady Dorking, the who runs the Board of Governors appoints Smart to the job. This angers her deputy, Colonel Crableigh, who had favoured promoting his nephew, the Deputy head.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.