New Showbiz

You are here:
Trog

Trog

1970

GP

Director

Freddie Francis

Runtime

91 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Anthropologist Dr Brockton unearths a primitive troglodyte — an Ice Age 'missing link': half-caveman, half-ape — in a local cave. Through experimentation, she manages to communicate with and domesticate him before he's released by an irate land developer and goes on a rampage, terrorising the local citizenry.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

1.4/10

Minimal

Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film operates within a conventional heteronormative framework. There are no identifiable LGBTQ+ characters or explorations of non-heteronormative intimacy.

Gender Representation

Limited

Dr. Brockton provides significant intellectual agency as a female anthropologist. However, the broader narrative reinforces traditional hierarchies and masculine roles of dominance.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Minimal

Casting is predominantly homogeneous, featuring white actors in primary roles. The film lacks diverse ethnic backgrounds or color-blind casting.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Limited

The prehistoric setting avoids modern institutions, yet the film presents a standard survivalist narrative. It does not explore moral relativism or systemic power dynamics.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There are no visible or invisible disabilities portrayed with agency. Characters are defined solely through physical capability and survivalist strength.

Strengths

  • Dr. Brockton serves as a female protagonist with significant intellectual agency and scientific authority.

Areas for Improvement

  • The film lacks racial and ethnic diversity, relying on a predominantly white cast.
  • There is no representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-heteronormative relationships.
  • The narrative fails to include characters with visible or invisible disabilities.
  • Female roles outside the protagonist remain largely secondary or domestic.

AI Analysis

Trog is a conventional creature feature that prioritizes genre spectacle over social complexity. While it offers a rare instance of female intellectual leadership through Dr. Brockton, the film remains tethered to the restrictive social norms of 1970s cinema. The narrative relies on mid-century tropes, utilizing a homogeneous cast and traditional gender archetypes. It fails to engage with intersectional identities or provide any meaningful representation of disability or LGBTQ+ life. Ultimately, the film functions as a straightforward exploration of the primitive versus the civilized. It lacks the depth required to challenge established social hierarchies or offer a diverse perspective on the human condition.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.