Sweet Anna
1958
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.7 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
The Anna Cross
1954
Director
Isidor Annensky
Runtime
82 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Based on the short story by A. P. Chekhov. Beggar 18-year-old beauty Anna marries a rich 52-year-old official to help her father and brothers. After the death of the mother, the father drinks, the brothers go hungry. For the sake of her relatives, she is ready for anything, even to become the wife of an elderly, rude, vulgar and hated Modest Alexeyevich.
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
4.3/10
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The narrative focuses strictly on heteronormative marital structures. There is no evidence of non-cisnormative identities or same-sex dynamics within the story.
Gender Representation
Anna serves as the central economic driver, exercising agency through sacrifice. While she enters a patriarchal marriage, the film highlights the inadequacy of the male relatives.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The setting suggests a homogeneous social environment typical of the era. There is no indication of a multi-ethnic or diverse cast.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film critiques the idealized family by portraying domestic life as a site of hunger and dysfunction. It uses class-based oppression to challenge traditional social structures.
Disability Representation
There are no visible or invisible disabilities portrayed that impact the narrative arc.
Strengths
- Subverts traditional gender hierarchies by positioning the female protagonist as the family's primary provider.
- Offers a sharp critique of class-based oppression and systemic vulgarity.
- Challenges the sanctity of the traditional family unit through realistic depictions of struggle.
Areas for Improvement
- Lacks representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-cisnormative dynamics.
- Features a homogeneous social environment with minimal racial or ethnic diversity.
- Does not address disability or diverse physical experiences.
AI Analysis
The film functions as a social realist critique of class and economic desperation. It centers on a woman's sacrificial agency within a rigid patriarchal framework, providing a nuanced look at gendered survival. However, the work lacks intersectional breadth. The social environment appears homogeneous, and the narrative lacks representation of LGBTQ+ identities or diverse ethnic backgrounds. Ultimately, the film's strength lies in its subversion of traditional family sanctity, focusing instead on the systemic pressures that force individuals into oppressive roles.
Similar Movies
The Bear
1938
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.1 out of 10
An Autumn Afternoon
1962
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.1 out of 10
The Cheat
1915
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.3 out of 10
The Stepmother
1973
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.9 out of 10
Esther Waters
1948
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.1 out of 10
Victoria
1979
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.7 out of 10
Twilight of a Woman's Soul
1913
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.6 out of 10
There Was an Old Couple
1965
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.7 out of 10
Therese
1962
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.7 out of 10
The Meek One
1960
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.8 out of 10
A Matter of Dignity
1958
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.9 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.