You are here:

A Fever in the Blood

Name: A Fever in the Blood
Director: Vincent Sherman
Released: 1961
Duration: 117 min

Representation Score

2.0/10

Limited

1961

Approved

Director

Vincent Sherman

Runtime

117 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

A Fever in the Blood is a mid-century political drama that emphasizes the mechanics of power and judicial integrity. Operating within a traditional moral framework, the film focuses on the ethical compromises of men climbing the political ladder. Produced in 1961, the film reflects the social and cinematic constraints of its time, functioning as a standard study of institutional corruption rather than a deconstruction of social hierarchies. The narrative lacks significant diversity, mirroring the demographic and social homogeneity of the American political landscape during the early 1960s.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does A Fever in the Blood have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film does not depict any LGBTQ+ identities or same-sex relationships, adhering strictly to the social norms and censorship standards of the early 1960s.

How does A Fever in the Blood portray gender?

Limited

The film centers on male-dominated roles such as a judge, district attorney, and senator, reinforcing traditional masculine leadership and professional hierarchies.

How racially and ethnically diverse is A Fever in the Blood?

Limited

Reflecting the demographic homogeneity of the era, the film centers on a traditional Anglo-Saxon institutional framework without any indication of diverse casting.

How does A Fever in the Blood represent religion and culture?

Fair

The story critiques personal ambition within Western political institutions, but focuses on individual ethics rather than a systemic critique of Western civilization or capitalism.

Does A Fever in the Blood include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no information regarding the inclusion or portrayal of characters with physical or neurodivergent disabilities.

Present on Screen

Offers a focused critique of the intersection between judicial integrity and personal political ambition.

Limited or Absent

Does not include representations of LGBTQ+ identities, women in leadership, or diverse racial backgrounds.
Reinforces traditional institutional hierarchies rather than challenging systemic social structures.

Official Synopsis

A judge, a district attorney and a U.S. senator, each hoping to be elected the next governor, attempt to manipulate a murder trial to advance their own political ambitions.

How are these scores produced? →