You are here:
Mary Shelley

Mary Shelley

2017

PG-13

Director

Haifaa al-Mansour

Runtime

120 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

The love affair between poet Percy Shelley and Mary Wollstonecraft Godwin resulted in the creation of an immortal novel, “Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus.”

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

5.6/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The film centers on the historical romance between Mary and Percy Shelley. It explores unconventional intimacy for the era but does not explicitly feature non-heteronormative identities.

Gender Representation

Excellent

The narrative prioritizes Mary Shelley’s intellectual agency and literary prowess. It successfully challenges 19th-century patriarchal structures by framing her as a driver of her own destiny.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The cast is homogeneous, reflecting the biographical realities of the European Romantic era. The film maintains strict adherence to the specific socio-historical context of the early 1800s.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The story offers a secular critique of religious and social frameworks. It prioritizes human imagination and creativity over the restrictive dogmas of the period.

Disability Representation

Fair

The film does not feature characters with specific physical or neurodivergent disabilities. It touches on themes of 'otherness' through the Frankenstein mythos but lacks direct representation.

Strengths

  • Strong emphasis on female intellectual agency and autonomy.
  • Effective critique of restrictive 19th-century social and religious institutions.
  • Nuanced portrayal of the struggle for personal identity against systemic expectations.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lack of racial and ethnic diversity due to strict historical realism.
  • Absence of explicit LGBTQ+ representation or non-heteronormative identities.
  • Minimal focus on characters with lived physical or neurodivergent disabilities.

AI Analysis

Haifaa al-Mansour’s direction transforms a biographical period piece into a study of individual agency against systemic constraints. The film excels by centering female intellectual autonomy, disrupting the traditional domestic roles often assigned to women in historical dramas. However, the film’s commitment to historical realism limits its demographic breadth. The cast remains racially homogeneous, and the narrative does not explicitly address LGBTQ+ identities or specific disabilities, keeping those scores relatively low. Ultimately, the film finds its strength in its progressive critique of Western institutions. It champions the power of the human mind to transcend the restrictive social and religious morality of the Regency era.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.