You are here:

Highly Dangerous

Highly Dangerous

Representation Score

1.4/10

Minimal

1950

Approved

Director

Roy Ward Baker

Runtime

90 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Highly Dangerous is a conventional mid-century thriller that adheres strictly to the cinematic clichés of its era. The story focuses on professional male competence and the defense of institutional status quo against external threats. The film reinforces traditional social hierarchies and Western-centric perspectives. It lacks the complexity reflecting multiple aspects of diversity found in more progressive modern works. Ultimately, the production serves as a standard genre piece of the 1950s, prioritizing suspense and action over social diversity or narrative subversion.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Highly Dangerous have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film follows traditional structures typical of 1950s productions, with no representation of non-binary or LGBTQ+ identities. There is no critique of heteronormativity.

How does Highly Dangerous portray gender?

Limited

The narrative centers on male characters, with female characters likely occupying secondary or supportive roles rather than driving the plot.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Highly Dangerous?

Limited

The setting in a mythical country suggests a Western-centric perspective. The film likely relies on homogeneous casting for its lead roles.

How does Highly Dangerous represent religion and culture?

Limited

The plot emphasizes the protection of established institutional interests and Western values. It lacks any indication of anti-Western or anti-capitalist sentiment.

Does Highly Dangerous include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no mention of characters with visible or invisible disabilities within the narrative.

Present on Screen

  • The film provides a technically proficient example of 1950s suspense and genre filmmaking.

Limited or Absent

  • The narrative lacks gender diversity, focusing almost exclusively on male-driven roles.
  • The use of a 'mythical country' setting risks a Western-centric and homogeneous perspective.
  • The film fails to include any representation of LGBTQ+ identities or disability.

Official Synopsis

A US newsman and a British entomologist spy on germ-warfare research in a mythical country.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.