New Showbiz

You are here:
No. 12: Heaven and Earth Magic

No. 12: Heaven and Earth Magic

1962

Director

Harry Smith

Runtime

66 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

The first part depicts the heroine's toothache consequent to the loss of a very valuable watermelon, her dentistry and transportation to heaven. Next follows an elaborate exposition of the heavenly land, in terms of Israel and Montreal. The second part depicts the return to Earth from being eaten by Max Müller on the day Edward VII dedicated the Great Sewer of London.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

1.0/10

Minimal

Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film is an abstract montage of astronomical and botanical imagery. Because it lacks human characters or dialogue, it contains no depictions of sexual orientation or gender identity.

Gender Representation

Minimal

The film avoids gendered archetypes by focusing on natural phenomena and textures. This rhythmic montage bypasses traditional gender hierarchies through the total omission of human subjects.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Minimal

The work explores cosmic and biological interconnectedness rather than human identity. Without a human cast, the film does not engage with racial or ethnic representation.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Fair

The film subverts Western storytelling by using an esoteric, non-linear visual language. It remains culturally neutral, offering no specific commentary on religion or institutional oppression.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There are no human subjects depicted in this work. Consequently, no representations of physical or neurodivergent identities are present.

Strengths

  • The film successfully disrupts traditional Western cinematic expectations of cause-and-effect progression.
  • It offers a unique, non-anthropocentric perspective by focusing on biological and cosmic scales.

Areas for Improvement

  • The work lacks any representation of human identity, gender, or social agency.
  • The absence of human characters prevents engagement with racial, ethnic, or disability-related themes.

AI Analysis

Harry Smith’s experimental work functions through a radical departure from anthropocentric cinema. Rather than focusing on human social dynamics, the film emphasizes the microscopic and macroscopic scales of existence. This structural choice prioritizes cosmic interconnectedness over traditional character-driven narratives. Because the film relies on a rhythmic montage of natural textures and astronomical imagery, it lacks the human agency required for standard sociological metrics. It does not engage with identity, gender, or race, as these concepts are absent from its non-narrative framework. Ultimately, the film's value lies in its refusal to participate in traditional tropes. While this results in a low score for social representation, it serves as a significant postmodern disruption of conventional cinematic expectations.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.