You are here:

Tropic of Cancer

Tropic of Cancer

Representation Score

7.7/10

Good

1970

NC-17

Director

Joseph Strick

Runtime

87 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Joseph Strick’s adaptation succeeds as a deconstruction of mid-century social and moral norms. It excels at challenging traditional Western institutions, specifically through its portrayal of moral relativism and the rejection of capitalist stability. However, the film is limited by its narrow demographic focus. The narrative is deeply rooted in a homogeneous expatriate experience, which results in a lack of racial and ethnic breadth. Ultimately, the work functions as a study of existential empowerment through non-conformity. It trades conventional cinematic polish for a raw, unvarnished look at an anti-social, bohemian lifestyle.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Tropic of Cancer have LGBTQ+ representation?

Good

The film explores sexual fluidity and non-straight lifestyles within a bohemian setting. It challenges rigid era-specific morals by using sexual discovery as a tool for personal growth.

How does Tropic of Cancer portray gender?

Good

Female characters are depicted with sexual ability to act rather than as traditional domestic figures. The narrative challenges traditional hierarchies by prioritizing liberation over stable family structures or masculine leadership.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Tropic of Cancer?

Limited

The setting reflects a predominantly white, Western European demographic consistent with the 1930s expatriate experience. There is a notable lack of significant racial or ethnic diversity.

How does Tropic of Cancer represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The film offers a strong critique of Western institutions, prioritizing secularism and moral relativism. It celebrates an anti-capitalist, anti-materialist lifestyle that rejects bourgeois stability.

Does Tropic of Cancer include disability representation?

Fair

The narrative focuses on socioeconomic struggles rather than explicit disabilities. While characters experience poverty-induced instability, these elements serve as atmospheric components of the bohemian experience.

Present on Screen

  • Strong critique of traditional Western institutions and religious morality.
  • Effective portrayal of sexual ability to act and the subversion of gender hierarchies.
  • Meaningful exploration of sexual fluidity and non-straight lifestyles.

Limited or Absent

  • Significant lack of racial and ethnic diversity within the cast and setting.
  • Absence of character-driven explorations regarding neurodivergence or disability.
  • Narrow focus on a specific, homogeneous white expatriate subculture.

Official Synopsis

Expat American writer Henry Miller hustles his way through Paris in a series of amorous encounters while trying to find his literary voice.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.