
State Funeral
2019

2018
Director
Vitaly Mansky
Runtime
103 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Russian Federation, December 31, 1999. After President Boris Yeltsin's unexpected resignation, Prime Minister Vladimir Putin becomes acting president of the country. From that day and for a year, Vitaly Mansky's camera documented Putin's rise to power. The story of a privileged witness. The harsh explanation of the reason why politics is the art of possibility of achieving the best with the support of many, but also of giving the worst in return.
Overall Score
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The documentary focuses strictly on high-level Kremlin political maneuvers. There is no discernible presence of LGBTQ+ characters or narratives addressing non-cisnormative identities.
Gender Representation
The film depicts a rigid patriarchal hierarchy centered on male political actors and security officials. It reinforces a masculine leadership model without female agency.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
Subjects reflect a homogeneous demographic consistent with the Russian political elite. The film does not engage with intersectional racial or ethnic narratives.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film excels in critiquing institutional power and the construction of national identity. It exposes how political truth is manufactured through state propaganda.
Disability Representation
There is no visible or invisible disability representation. The focus remains entirely on the psychological and political maneuvers of the ruling class.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Vitaly Mansky’s documentary serves as a postmodern deconstruction of political image-making. Rather than a standard biography, it uses archival footage to dismantle the manufactured reality of Vladimir Putin's rise to power. The film prioritizes a semiotic interrogation of authority over traditional storytelling. While the film lacks demographic breadth, it offers significant intellectual depth. It challenges the sanctity of state institutions by exposing the gap between public persona and private reality. This makes it a study of power rather than a study of people. Ultimately, the work functions as a critique of centralized power structures. It replaces official state narratives with a fragmented view of leadership, focusing on how institutional mythologies are maintained.

2019

1990

2021

2020

2022

1994

1993

2019

2020

1975

2014

2006
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.