Building Bombs
1989
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 6.1 out of 10
You are here:
Atomic Homefront
Representation Score
8.4/10
Excellent
2017
TV-14Director
Rebecca Cammisa
Runtime
100 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetNew Showbiz Analysis
Atomic Homefront succeeds as an investigative piece that reframes historical events. By shifting the focus from the technological achievements of the Manhattan Project to the localized impacts of waste management, the film highlights systemic neglect. The documentary excels in its examination of environmental racism and institutional critique, effectively centering the voices of underrepresented communities affected by corporate and governmental entities. However, the film remains narrow in scope. Its focus on environmental and systemic harm means that identity-based representation, such as LGBTQ+ themes, is largely absent from the narrative.
Category Breakdown
Does Atomic Homefront have LGBTQ+ representation?
The film focuses on environmental justice and government accountability rather than LGBTQ+ themes. There is no direct exploration of LGBTQ+ issues in this investigative storyline.
How does Atomic Homefront portray gender?
The narrative emphasizes the human cost of industrial negligence, focusing on community resilience and collective action rather than traditional hero stories.
How racially and ethnically diverse is Atomic Homefront?
The documentary examines how radioactive waste dumping affects specific underrepresented neighborhoods, highlighting environmental racism. It gives significant attention to the experiences of communities of color.
How does Atomic Homefront represent religion and culture?
The film critiques Western institutions and corporate entities, prioritizing the lived experiences of communities over official state narratives about the Manhattan Project.
Does Atomic Homefront include disability representation?
While specific disabilities are not detailed, the subject matter touches on chronic illness. The film likely addresses the health impacts of uranium exposure.
Present on Screen
- Strong focus on environmental racism and the impact of industrial negligence on underrepresented communities.
- Effective institutional critique that challenges official state and corporate narratives.
- Prioritizes community-driven ability to act and lived experiences over traditional historical hierarchies.
Limited or Absent
- Lack of explicit representation regarding LGBTQ+ identities and themes.
- Limited detail regarding specific disability or chronic illness narratives within the core synopsis.
Official Synopsis
Revealing St. Louis, Missouri's atomic past as a uranium processing center for the atomic bomb and the governmental and corporate negligence that lead to the illegal dumping of Manhattan Project radioactive waste throughout North County neighborhoods.
Where to Watch
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select or search, Escape to close.
Similar Movies
Gasland
2010
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 5.0 out of 10
Downwind
2023
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 8.3 out of 10
Deadly Deception: General Electric, Nuclear Weapons and Our Environment
1991
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 8.5 out of 10
The Atomic States of America
2012
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 5.7 out of 10
Radium City
1988
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 6.2 out of 10
Nuclear Savage: The Islands of Secret Project 4.1
2011
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 8.9 out of 10
Half Life
1986
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 6.6 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.