You are here:

The Atomic States of America

The Atomic States of America

Representation Score

5.7/10

Fair

2012

Not Rated

Director

Sheena M. Joyce, Don Argott

Runtime

95 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

The film primarily functions as a critique of institutional power and industrial capitalism. It prioritizes the vulnerability of the individual over corporate or state stability, challenging the progress narratives promoted by Western energy sectors. While the documentary lacks identity-based representation regarding LGBTQ+ or specific racial the way different parts of someone's identity overlap, it excels in its deconstruction of industrial hierarchies. The narrative architecture shifts focus toward the human cost of systemic negligence. Ultimately, the film's impact lies in its systemic critique rather than a broad spectrum of social identity representation.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does The Atomic States of America have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film focuses on environmental health and nuclear energy policy. There are no LGBTQ+ character arcs or narratives that address the assumption that everyone is straight or cisgender.

How does The Atomic States of America portray gender?

Fair

The narrative is driven by Kelly McMasters's personal memoir. Centering a female perspective critiques a male-dominated industrial and political landscape, disrupting traditional hierarchies of authority.

How racially and ethnically diverse is The Atomic States of America?

Fair

The film examines how energy policy impacts diverse populations. However, there is no specific evidence of a non-white majority cast or stories reflecting multiple aspects of identity.

How does The Atomic States of America represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The film engages critically with Western institutions. It frames the nuclear industry and regulatory bodies as entities prioritizing capital over community well-being.

Does The Atomic States of America include disability representation?

Good

The documentary addresses the physical consequences of environmental exposure. It provides a platform for residents experiencing chronic illness or physical impairment resulting from systemic failures.

Present on Screen

  • Centers a female memoirist to disrupt traditional male-dominated industrial hierarchies.
  • Provides a platform for individuals experiencing chronic illness due to environmental exposure.
  • Offers a strong systemic critique of Western industrial and regulatory institutions.

Limited or Absent

  • Lacks visible LGBTQ+ character arcs or narratives.
  • Provides limited evidence of multi-layered racial narratives or a diverse cast.
  • Focuses heavily on a specific geographic location rather than broader racial diversity.

Official Synopsis

Based on Kelly McMasters’s memoir about growing up in a nuclear-reactor community, this stirring film illustrates the dire health consequences for many residents in Shirley, her Long Island hometown. Yet despite the known risks of utilizing nuclear power, our country’s rapidly increasing energy needs are fueling a nuclear renaissance.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.