
Gasland Part II
2013

2010
NRDirector
Josh Fox
Runtime
107 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
It is happening all across America-rural landowners wake up one day to find a lucrative offer from an energy company wanting to lease their property. Reason? The company hopes to tap into a reservoir dubbed the "Saudi Arabia of natural gas." Halliburton developed a way to get the gas out of the ground-a hydraulic drilling process called "fracking"-and suddenly America finds itself on the precipice of becoming an energy superpower.
Overall Score
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film does not engage with LGBTQ+ identities or non-cisnormative gender narratives. The environmental subject matter lacks a framework for queer storytelling.
Gender Representation
The narrative centers on the agency of local community members, both men and women. It avoids reinforcing traditional patriarchal leadership by focusing on stakeholders in the environmental crisis.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The film focuses on rural, often homogeneous American landscapes. It prioritizes class-based tensions over intersectional casting or diverse racial narratives.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film offers a sophisticated critique of industrial capitalism and Western regulatory institutions. It portrays grassroots resistance as a necessary rebellion against predatory corporate structures.
Disability Representation
Health crises caused by water contamination are documented throughout the film. However, these instances frame residents as victims of negligence rather than providing nuanced character development.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Gasland is an investigative documentary that prioritizes systemic critique over demographic variety. Its strength lies in its ideological challenge to institutional authority and corporate power, framing the struggle as a fight for local sovereignty against industrial capitalism. However, the film lacks significant representation of marginalized identities. The focus on rural, homogeneous landscapes and the absence of LGBTQ+ or diverse racial narratives limit its demographic breadth. Ultimately, the film's progressive profile is driven by its anti-institutional themes rather than its social diversity. It succeeds as a critique of power dynamics but remains narrow in its human representation.

2013

2009

2011

2012

2019

2010

2016

2007

2015

2014

2021

2009
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.