You are here:

The Man Who Would Be King

Name: The Man Who Would Be King
Director: John Huston
Released: 1975
Duration: 129 min

Representation Score

2.3/10

Limited

1975

Director

John Huston

Runtime

129 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

John Huston’s direction transforms this adventure into a nuanced critique of systemic arrogance. Despite the lack of gender and LGBTQ+ diversity, the film avoids being a straightforward colonialist epic by dismantling the 'Great Man' theory. The film’s strength lies in its sophisticated post-colonial perspective. It uses the protagonists’ failure to highlight the instability of Western imperialist institutions and the myth of absolute authority. Ultimately, the film’s value is found in its portrayal of the imposition of Western hierarchies on local social fabrics as a source of inevitable tragedy.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does The Man Who Would Be King have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The story centers on the strong bond between the two male leads, without any queer identities or non-straight relationships in the character arcs.

How does The Man Who Would Be King portray gender?

Minimal

The film adheres to a patriarchal structure where female characters play minor roles, serving as cultural markers rather than active drivers of the plot.

How racially and ethnically diverse is The Man Who Would Be King?

Fair

The narrative features a predominantly non-Anglo-Saxon cast but maintains a colonialist viewpoint. However, it effectively challenges the myth of colonial invincibility through the protagonists' downfall.

How does The Man Who Would Be King represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The film stands out as an anti-colonialist narrative. It questions the 'civilizing mission' by depicting Western power structures as fragile, doomed, and morally questionable endeavors.

Does The Man Who Would Be King include disability representation?

Minimal

There are no significant representations of visible or invisible disabilities in the narrative arc.

Present on Screen

Sophisticated critique of Western imperialist institutions and the 'civilizing mission'.
Effective deconstruction of the myth of colonial invincibility and Western superiority.
Nuanced exploration of the fragility of grand ambitions and absolute authority.

Limited or Absent

Limited gender representation, with female characters sidelined.
Complete absence of LGBTQ+ identities or non-straight perspectives.
Narrative perspective remains rooted in a colonialist gaze despite its critical themes.

Official Synopsis

Tired of life as soldiers, Peachy Carnehan and Danny Dravot travel to the isolated land of Kafiristan, where they are ultimately embraced by the people and revered as rulers. After a series of misunderstandings, the natives come to believe that Dravot is a god, but he and Carnehan can't keep up their deception forever.

How are these scores produced? →